H2H

Intel Core i9-12900TEVSIntel Core Ultra 7 265F

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core i9-12900TE
♜ WINNERIntel Core i9-12900TE+1%Better overall performance
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
IntelCore i9-12900TE

฿0.00Average price

VS

฿12,883.34Average price

IntelCore Ultra 7 265F
VS
WINNERCore i9-12900TE0%H2H overall index
ประสิทธิภาพ5061
ประสิทธิผล10063
Data confidence6262

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Core i9-12900TEIntel Core i9-12900TEIntel
Core Ultra 7 265FIntel Core Ultra 7 265FIntel
H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
5061
Single-core
8088
Multi-core
5064
L3 cache
11
Efficiency
10063
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Intel Core i9-12900TEIntelCore i9-12900TE0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265FIntelCore Ultra 7 265F0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ

The devices received the same overall score

Core i9-12900TE leads in overall performance, while Core i9-12900TE offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE฿12,883

Core i9-12900TE costs less

คะแนนรวม

ภาพรวม

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryCore i9-12900TECore Ultra 7 265F
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50
61Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42
50Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40
48Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
63
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61
61
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม

ข้อมูลจำเพาะ

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationCore i9-12900TECore Ultra 7 265F
PassMark3505749403Better
คอร์ / เธรด8P+8E / 248P+12E / 20
Clock speedP 1,1 - 4,8 GHz / E 1 - 3,6 GHzP 2,4 - 5,3 GHz / E 1,8 - 4,6 GHzBetter
Base clock1100 MHz2400 MHzBetter
Boost clock4800 MHz5300 MHzBetter
Кэш14+30 MB36+30 MBBetter
Кэш L330 MB30 MB
ซ็อกเก็ตLGA1700LGA1851Better
Встроенная графикаUHD 770 1,5 GHz-
PBP / MTP35 / - W65 / 121 WBetter
Power consumption35 / - WBetter65 / 121 W
Поддержка памятиDDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200DDR5-6400
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)3 nmBetter
ArchitectureAlder LakeArrow Lake
Кодовое имяAlder LakeArrow Lake
Release date
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexCore i9-12900TECore Ultra 7 265FDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100808810%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100506425%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100516219%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexCore i9-12900TECore Ultra 7 265FDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100354321%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100394821%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100293622%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100404920%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100384619%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i9-12900TE61
Device BCore Ultra 7 265F61
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-12900TE or Core Ultra 7 265F?

Core i9-12900TE has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i9-12900TE offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i9-12900TE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i9-12900TE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i9-12900TE offers more overall performance, while Core i9-12900TE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i9-12900TE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i9-12900TE is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i9-12900TE leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-12900TE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i9-12900TE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i9-12900TE is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i9-12900TE is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i9-12900TE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.