
Intel Core i9-9900VSAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
Intel
Core i9-9900

VSWINNERCore i9-99000%H2H overall index
AMD
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

ประสิทธิภาพ4582
ประสิทธิผล872
Data confidence6275
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
4582
8385
41100
07
872
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelCore i9-99000No verified public setup yet
AMDRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX0No verified public setup yet
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ
The devices received the same overall score
Core i9-9900 leads in overall performance, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Core i9-9900 costs less
คะแนนรวม
ภาพรวม
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45
82Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39
65Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36
63Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
87Better
2
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54
54
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม
ข้อมูลจำเพาะ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
PassMark16590154293Better
คอร์ / เธรด8 / 1696 / 192Better
Clock speed3,1 - 5 GHzBetter2,5 - 5,1 GHz
Base clock3100 MHzBetter2500 MHz
Boost clock5000 MHz5100 MHzBetter
Кэш16 MB96+384 MBBetter
Кэш L316 MB384 MBBetter
ซ็อกเก็ตLGA1151v2BettersTR5
Встроенная графикаUHD 630 1,2 GHzBetter350 W
PBP / MTP65 WBetterDDR5-5200 8 каналов
Power consumption65 WDDR5-5200 8 каналовBetter
Поддержка памятиDDR4-2666 / DDR3-18665 nmBetter
Process node14 nmStorm Peak
ArchitectureCoffee Lake Refresh—
Кодовое имяCoffee Lake Refresh—
Release date——
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10083852%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 1004110084%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100478153%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100338184%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100016200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100325959%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100356560%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100265063%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100366760%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100346360%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-9900 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX?+
Core i9-9900 has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core i9-9900 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core i9-9900 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core i9-9900 offers more overall performance, while Core i9-9900 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core i9-9900 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core i9-9900 leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-9900 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core i9-9900 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core i9-9900 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.
