Ryzen AI Max 385VSRyzen 5 7640U
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRyzen AI Max 385+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen AI Max 385
VSWINNERRyzen AI Max 3851%H2H overall index
AMD
Ryzen 5 7640U
ประสิทธิภาพ8382
Data confidence2525
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Single-core
8382
8382
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRyzen AI Max 3850No verified public setup yet
AMDRyzen 5 7640U0No verified public setup yet
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the best overall choice
Ryzen AI Max 385 leads in overall performance, while Ryzen AI Max 385 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Ryzen AI Max 385 leads in the combined performance index
Prices are identical
คะแนนรวม
ภาพรวม
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
83Better
82
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
66Better
65
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
64Better
63
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
76Better
75
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
83Better
82
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม
ข้อมูลจำเพาะ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
СерияRyzen AI MaxRyzen 7040
ArchitectureZen 5BetterZen 4
Кодовое имяStrix HaloPhoenix
Год выпуска2025Better2023
Ядра8Better6
Потоки16Better12
Base clock3.6 GHzBetter3.5 GHz
Boost clock5 GHzBetter4.9 GHz
Встроенная графикаRadeon 8040SBetterRadeon 760M
Форм-факторMobileMobile
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10083821%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10083821%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10083821%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10083821%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10083821%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10083821%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10083821%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen AI Max 385 or Ryzen 5 7640U?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen AI Max 385 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 offers more overall performance, while Ryzen AI Max 385 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen AI Max 385 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Ryzen AI Max 385 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.