Intel Xeon W-1290VSIntel Xeon W-1290T
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Xeon W-1290+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Xeon W-1290
VSWINNERXeon W-12900%H2H overall index
Intel
Xeon W-1290T
ประสิทธิภาพ5348
ประสิทธิผล83100
Data confidence6262
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelIntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
5348
8778
5348
00
83100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelXeon W-12900No verified public setup yet
IntelXeon W-1290T0No verified public setup yet
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ
The devices received the same overall score
Xeon W-1290 leads in overall performance, while Xeon W-1290 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
คะแนนรวม
ภาพรวม
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
53Better
48
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45Better
41
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
42Better
39
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60
60
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม
ข้อมูลจำเพาะ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
PassMark20123Better18409
คอร์ / เธรด10 / 2010 / 20
Clock speed3,2 - 5,2 GHzBetter1,9 - 4,7 GHz
Base clock3200 MHzBetter1900 MHz
Boost clock5200 MHzBetter4700 MHz
Кэш20 MB20 MB
Кэш L320 MB20 MB
ซ็อกเก็ตLGA1200LGA1200
Встроенная графикаUHD P630 1,2 GHzUHD P630 1,2 GHz
PBP / MTP80 WBetter35 W
Power consumption80 W35 WBetter
Поддержка памятиDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
Process node14 nm14 nm
ArchitectureComet LakeComet Lake
Кодовое имяComet LakeComet Lake
Release date——
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100877811%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100534810%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100555010%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100423810%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10037348%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100312810%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100423810%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100403611%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Xeon W-1290 or Xeon W-1290T?+
Xeon W-1290 has the higher overall gaming score, while Xeon W-1290 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Xeon W-1290 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Xeon W-1290 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Xeon W-1290 offers more overall performance, while Xeon W-1290 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Xeon W-1290 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Xeon W-1290 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Xeon W-1290 leads in combined 1440p performance. Xeon W-1290 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Xeon W-1290 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Xeon W-1290T is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Xeon W-1290T is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Xeon W-1290 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.