Radeon 780M 8700GVSGeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon 780M 8700G+28%Better gaming performance
AMD
780M 8700G
VSWINNER780M 8700G25%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 3050 6 GB
ประสิทธิภาพ5039
Price / Performance98100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
5039
98100
ชุมชน · ข้อมูลยืนยันแล้ว
เปิดสเปกสตรีมเมอร์→ฮาร์ดแวร์ที่สตรีมเมอร์ใช้
ชุดอุปกรณ์จริงแบบสาธารณะที่เชื่อมกับแต่ละอุปกรณ์
AMD780M 8700G0ยังไม่มีสเปกสาธารณะที่ยืนยันแล้ว
NVIDIARTX 3050 6 GB0ยังไม่มีสเปกสาธารณะที่ยืนยันแล้ว
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ
The devices received the same overall score
780M 8700G leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RTX 3050 6 GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 46–51of 81
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 780M 8700G
0 ถูกใจHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
คะแนนรวม
ภาพรวม
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
55
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62
62
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม
ข้อมูลจำเพาะ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
TDP—70 W
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DirectX—12.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
TFLOPS8.91Better6.774
Clock speed800 - 2900 MHz1042 - 1470 MHzBetter
Video memory- SMA6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory clock—14 GHz
Memory bus—96 bit
Bandwidth—168 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x8
Power connector—None
Power consumption—70 W
Release date20232024
Architecture—Ampere
Recommended PSU—250 W
Length—242 mm
Thickness—Dual-slot
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
Launch price—$229
Transistor count—8700 million
Die size—200 mm²
Shader units / Cores—2304
Memory cache—L1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Base clock800 MHz1042 MHzBetter
Boost clock2900 MHzBetter1470 MHz
Process node4 nmBetter8 nm
FPS ในเกม
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100503925%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100584427%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100504511%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100060200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10050492%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10050484%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100504511%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10050512%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100504511%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX—12.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
Basic information
Architecture—Ampere
Process node4 nmBetter8 nm
Release date20232024
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count—8700 million
Die size—200 mm²
Shader units / Cores—2304
Base clock800 MHz1042 MHzBetter
Boost clock2900 MHzBetter1470 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x8
Length—242 mm
Thickness—Dual-slot
Recommended PSU—250 W
Power connector—None
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory- SMA6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus—96 bit
TFLOPS8.91Better6.774
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
AI อธิบาย · HEAD TO HEAD
อธิบายการเปรียบเทียบนี้
มากกว่าเปอร์เซ็นต์: สาเหตุ สเปกที่เกี่ยวข้อง และผลกระทบจริงหลังกราฟแต่ละอัน
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
สเปกจริง
ประสบการณ์จากเจ้าของ
สเปกจริง ผลลัพธ์ และความคิดเห็นจากชุมชน
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 780M 8700G or RTX 3050 6 GB?+
780M 8700G has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
780M 8700G offers more overall performance, while 780M 8700G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
780M 8700G leads in combined 1440p performance. 780M 8700G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
780M 8700G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 780M 8700G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.