Radeon RX 6550MVSRadeon Pro W6800
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6550M+9%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6550M
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6550M9%H2H overall index
AMD
Pro W6800
ประสิทธิภาพ5053
ประสิทธิผล10071
Data confidence4560
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5053
10071
60100
ชุมชน · ข้อมูลยืนยันแล้ว
เปิดสเปกสตรีมเมอร์→ฮาร์ดแวร์ที่สตรีมเมอร์ใช้
ชุดอุปกรณ์จริงแบบสาธารณะที่เชื่อมกับแต่ละอุปกรณ์
AMDRadeon RX 6550M0ยังไม่มีสเปกสาธารณะที่ยืนยันแล้ว
AMDPro W68000ยังไม่มีสเปกสาธารณะที่ยืนยันแล้ว
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ
Radeon RX 6550M is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 6550M leads in combined gaming performance. Pro W6800 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 6550M leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 6550M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 93–98of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6550M
0 ถูกใจHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Pro W6800
50/100 · Price $2499The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
คะแนนรวม
ภาพรวม
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50
53Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40
42Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
71
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
56
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม
ข้อมูลจำเพาะ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort—6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS5.81617.83Better
TDP80 WBetter250 W
ArchitectureRDNA 2RDNA 2.0
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Launch price—$2499
Shader units / Cores10243840Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4x16
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Release date2023-01-042021
Recommended PSU—600 W
Length—267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Die size107 mm²Better520 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 1 MBL1 128 KB, L2 4 MB
Clock speed2000–2840 MHz2075 - 2320 MHzBetter
Base clock2000 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock2840 MHzBetter2320 MHz
Video memory4 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock2250 MHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
Bandwidth144 GB/s512 GB/sBetter
Power consumption80 WBetter250 W
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Transistor count5400 million26800 millionBetter
FPS ในเกม
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10050536%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100586410%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100536622%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006010050%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007134%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100557429%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100547229%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100536622%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100567934%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100536723%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 2RDNA 2.0
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2023-01-042021
Detailed specifications
Transistor count5400 million26800 millionBetter
Die size107 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / Cores10243840Better
Base clock2000 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock2840 MHzBetter2320 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4x16
Length—267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSU—600 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort—6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory4 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS5.81617.83Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI อธิบาย · HEAD TO HEAD
อธิบายการเปรียบเทียบนี้
มากกว่าเปอร์เซ็นต์: สาเหตุ สเปกที่เกี่ยวข้อง และผลกระทบจริงหลังกราฟแต่ละอัน
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
สเปกจริง
ประสบการณ์จากเจ้าของ
สเปกจริง ผลลัพธ์ และความคิดเห็นจากชุมชน
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6550M or Pro W6800?+
Radeon RX 6550M has the higher overall gaming score, while Pro W6800 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 6550M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 6550M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6550M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6550M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 6550M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Pro W6800 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6550M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6550M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6550M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6550M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6550M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6550M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.