GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6XVSRadeon RX 6700M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X+2%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
VSWINNERRTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X2%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6700M
ประสิทธิภาพ4649
ประสิทธิผล68100
Data confidence6045
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
4649
68100
ชุมชน · ข้อมูลยืนยันแล้ว
เปิดสเปกสตรีมเมอร์→ฮาร์ดแวร์ที่สตรีมเมอร์ใช้
ชุดอุปกรณ์จริงแบบสาธารณะที่เชื่อมกับแต่ละอุปกรณ์
NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X0ยังไม่มีสเปกสาธารณะที่ยืนยันแล้ว
AMDRadeon RX 6700M0ยังไม่มีสเปกสาธารณะที่ยืนยันแล้ว
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is the best overall choice
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 6700M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 84–89of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
0 ถูกใจHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
100/100 · Price $399The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
คะแนนรวม
ภาพรวม
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46
49Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40
42Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37
39Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
68
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
60
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม
ข้อมูลจำเพาะ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS16.2Better11.06
TDP225 W135 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Power connector8 pinNone
Release date20222021-05-31
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 2
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$399—
Shader units / Cores4864Better2304
Clock speed1410 - 1665 MHz1489–2400 MHzBetter
Base clock1410 MHz1489 MHzBetter
Boost clock1665 MHz2400 MHzBetter
Video memory8 GB GDDR6X10 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock19 GHz2000 MHzBetter
Memory bus256 bitBetter160 bit
Bandwidth608 GB/sBetter320 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power consumption225 W135 WBetter
Process node8 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU550 W—
Length242 mm—
Die size392 mm²335 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 4 MBL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
Transistor count17400 millionBetter17200 million
FPS ในเกม
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100485412%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006810038%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 2
Process node8 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20222021-05-31
Detailed specifications
Transistor count17400 millionBetter17200 million
Die size392 mm²335 mm²Better
Shader units / Cores4864Better2304
Base clock1410 MHz1489 MHzBetter
Boost clock1665 MHz2400 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU550 W—
Power connector8 pinNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR6X10 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter160 bit
TFLOPS16.2Better11.06
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
AI อธิบาย · HEAD TO HEAD
อธิบายการเปรียบเทียบนี้
มากกว่าเปอร์เซ็นต์: สาเหตุ สเปกที่เกี่ยวข้อง และผลกระทบจริงหลังกราฟแต่ละอัน
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
สเปกจริง
ประสบการณ์จากเจ้าของ
สเปกจริง ผลลัพธ์ และความคิดเห็นจากชุมชน
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X or Radeon RX 6700M?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X offers more overall performance, while RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6700M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6700M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.