Radeon RX 6800VSRadeon RX 7900M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6800+2%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 6800
VSWINNERRX 68002%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 7900M
ประสิทธิภาพ5052
ประสิทธิผล6796
Data confidence6045
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5052
6796
8888
ชุมชน · ข้อมูลยืนยันแล้ว
เปิดสเปกสตรีมเมอร์→ฮาร์ดแวร์ที่สตรีมเมอร์ใช้
ชุดอุปกรณ์จริงแบบสาธารณะที่เชื่อมกับแต่ละอุปกรณ์
AMDRX 68000ยังไม่มีสเปกสาธารณะที่ยืนยันแล้ว
AMDRadeon RX 7900M0ยังไม่มีสเปกสาธารณะที่ยืนยันแล้ว
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ
RX 6800 is the best overall choice
RX 6800 leads in combined gaming performance. RX 6800 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 6800 leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 7900M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 52–57of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800
0 ถูกใจHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 6800
100/100 · Price $579The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
คะแนนรวม
ภาพรวม
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50
52Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42
44Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40
41Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67
96Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
62
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม
ข้อมูลจำเพาะ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP250 W180 WBetter
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C—
DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS16.1738.52Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Release date20202023-10-19
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 3Better
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$579—
Shader units / Cores38404608Better
Clock speed1700 - 2105 MHz1825–2090 MHzBetter
Base clock1700 MHz1825 MHzBetter
Boost clock2105 MHzBetter2090 MHz
Video memory16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory clock16 GHz2250 MHzBetter
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Bandwidth512 GB/s576 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power consumption250 W180 WBetter
Process node7 nm5 nmBetter
Recommended PSU600 W—
Length267 mm—
Die size520 mm²Better529 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 4 MBL1 250 KB, L2 6 MB
Transistor count26800 million57700 millionBetter
FPS ในเกม
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10050524%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10059602%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10061622%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100679636%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10067681%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10065662%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10061622%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10071721%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10061633%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 3Better
Process node7 nm5 nmBetter
Release date20202023-10-19
Detailed specifications
Transistor count26800 million57700 millionBetter
Die size520 mm²Better529 mm²
Shader units / Cores38404608Better
Base clock1700 MHz1825 MHzBetter
Boost clock2105 MHzBetter2090 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU600 W—
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C—
DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS16.1738.52Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI อธิบาย · HEAD TO HEAD
อธิบายการเปรียบเทียบนี้
มากกว่าเปอร์เซ็นต์: สาเหตุ สเปกที่เกี่ยวข้อง และผลกระทบจริงหลังกราฟแต่ละอัน
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
สเปกจริง
ประสบการณ์จากเจ้าของ
สเปกจริง ผลลัพธ์ และความคิดเห็นจากชุมชน
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6800 or Radeon RX 7900M?+
RX 6800 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6800 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 6800 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 6800 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6800 offers more overall performance, while RX 6800 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 6800 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 6800 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6800 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6800 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6800 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7900M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6800 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.