Radeon RX Vega 56VSRadeon RX Vega 64 / Liquid Cooling
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX Vega 56+2%Better overall performance
AMD
RX Vega 56
VSWINNERRX Vega 562%H2H overall index
AMD
RX Vega 64 / Liquid Cooling
ประสิทธิภาพ4146
ประสิทธิผล6544
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4146
6544
100100
6868
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX Vega 560No verified public setup yet
AMDRX Vega 64 / Liquid Cooling0No verified public setup yet
ผลการเปรียบเทียบ
RX Vega 56 is the best overall choice
RX Vega 56 leads in combined gaming performance. RX Vega 56 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX Vega 56 leads in the combined performance index
RX Vega 56 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 133–138of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX Vega 56
0 ถูกใจHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX Vega 56
100/100 · Price $309The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
คะแนนรวม
ภาพรวม
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
41
46Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
36
40Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
37Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
65Better
44
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
56
การเปรียบเทียบฉบับเต็ม
ข้อมูลจำเพาะ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1156 - 1471 MHz1406 - 1677 MHzBetter
Base clock1156 MHz1406 MHzBetter
Boost clock1471 MHz1677 MHzBetter
VRAM8 GB HBM28 GB HBM2
Memory typeHBM2HBM2
VRAM capacity8 GB8 GB
ความถี่หน่วยความจำ1,6 GHz1,89 GHzBetter
Memory bus2048 bit2048 bit
Memory bandwidth410 GB/s484 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Power connector8+8 pin8+8 pin
Power consumption210 WBetter345 W
TDP210 WBetter345 W
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20172017
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS10.5413.74Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS ในเกม
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100414611%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100465110%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10049526%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100654439%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10053566%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10052556%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10049526%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10056584%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10049538%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20172017
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1156 MHz1406 MHzBetter
Boost clock1471 MHz1677 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8+8 pin8+8 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM8 GB HBM28 GB HBM2
Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Memory bus2048 bit2048 bit
Memory bandwidth410 GB/s484 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับการเปรียบเทียบ
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX Vega 56 or RX Vega 64 / Liquid Cooling?+
RX Vega 56 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX Vega 56 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX Vega 56 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX Vega 56 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX Vega 56 offers more overall performance, while RX Vega 56 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX Vega 56 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX Vega 56 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX Vega 56 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX Vega 56 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX Vega 56 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX Vega 56 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX Vega 56 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX Vega 56 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.