Intel Arc A750VSGeForce RTX 4090
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A750+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Arc A750
VSWINNERArc A7500%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
RTX 4090
Performans5675
Verimlilik8356
Price / Performance10066
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5675
8356
10066
68100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelArc A7500No verified public setup yet
NVIDIARTX 40900No verified public setup yet
KARŞILAŞTIRMA SONUCU
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A750 leads in combined gaming performance. Arc A750 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Arc A750 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 28–33of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A750
0 beğeniHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A750
100/100 · Price $289The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GENEL PUAN
Genel bakış
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
56
75Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
47
73Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44
58Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83Better
56
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70
70
TAM KARŞILAŞTIRMA
Özellikler
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP225 WBetter450 W
Process node6 nm5 nmBetter
Release date20222022
Architecture——
Clock speed2050 - 2400 MHz2235 - 2520 MHzBetter
Base clock2050 MHz2235 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHz2520 MHzBetter
VRAM8 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6XBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
VRAM capacity8 GB24 GBBetter
Bellek frekansı16 GHz21 GHzBetter
Memory bus256 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s1008 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Power connector6+8 pin16 pinBetter
Power consumption225 WBetter450 W
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS17.282.58Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Oyun FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100567529%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100618027%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100598233%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006810038%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100835639%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100628632%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100618533%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100598233%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100638934%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100608332%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node6 nm5 nmBetter
Release date20222022
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock2050 MHz2235 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHz2520 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6+8 pin16 pinBetter
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM8 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6XBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus256 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s1008 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
740M 8300GAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Karşılaştırma hakkında sık sorulanlar
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A750 or RTX 4090?+
Arc A750 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4090 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4090 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A750 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4090 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4090 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A750 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4090 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A750 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A750 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.