Intel Arc B770VSRadeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc B770+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Arc B770
VSWINNERArc B7700%H2H overall index
AMD
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Performans5963
Price / Performance99100
Data confidence7530
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelAMDPerformance
Price / performance
5963
99100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelArc B7700No verified public setup yet
AMDNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx0No verified public setup yet
KARŞILAŞTIRMA SONUCU
The devices received the same overall score
Arc B770 leads in combined gaming performance. Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 18–23of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc B770
0 beğeniHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
100/100 · Price $89The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GENEL PUAN
Genel bakış
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
59
63Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
55Better
52
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46
49Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
87Better
65
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72
72
TAM KARŞILAŞTIRMA
Özellikler
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TFLOPS28Better0.56
Launch price——
Clock speed2100 - 2400 MHzBetter400 - 2200 MHz
Base clock2100 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter2200 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
VRAM capacity16 GB-
Bellek frekansı16 GHz-
Memory bus256 bit-
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s—
InterfacePCIe 4x16IGP
Power connector6+8 pin-
Power consumption225 W-
TDP225 W-
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Release date2026Better2022
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Oyun FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10059637%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10067653%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10067636%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100880200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100870200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100726313%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100716312%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10067636%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100756317%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10068638%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Release date2026Better2022
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock2100 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter2200 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16IGP
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6+8 pin-
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM16 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus256 bit-
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s—
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Karşılaştırma hakkında sık sorulanlar
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc B770 or Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx?+
Arc B770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc B770 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc B770 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc B770 offers more overall performance, while Arc B770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc B770 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc B770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc B770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc B770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc B770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc B770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.