ATI Radeon HD 4350VSRadeon RX 6700M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERATI Radeon HD 4350+12%Better overall performance
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 4350
VSWINNERATI Radeon HD 435011%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6700M
Performans4749
Verimlilik100100
Data confidence6045
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
4749
100100
TOPLULUK · DOĞRULANMIŞ VERİ
Yayıncı sistemlerini aç→Yayıncıların kullandığı donanım
Her cihazla bağlantılı gerçek herkese açık sistemler.
AMDATI Radeon HD 43500Henüz doğrulanmış herkese açık sistem yok
AMDRadeon RX 6700M0Henüz doğrulanmış herkese açık sistem yok
KARŞILAŞTIRMA SONUCU
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the best overall choice
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined gaming performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 6700M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 46–51of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 4350
0 beğeniHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 4350
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GENEL PUAN
Genel bakış
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
47
49Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40
42Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
38
39Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
60
TAM KARŞILAŞTIRMA
Özellikler
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.0—
USB Type-C——
DirectX10.112.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.09611.06Better
TDP20 WBetter135 W
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Clock speed600 MHz1489–2400 MHzBetter
Base clock600 MHz1489 MHzBetter
Boost clock600 MHz2400 MHzBetter
Video memory512 MB DDR2Better10 GB GDDR6
Memory clock800 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Power connectorNoneNone
Release date20082021-05-31
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 2
Length——
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$79—
Shader units / Cores802304Better
Memory bus64 bit160 bitBetter
Bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter320 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power consumption20 WBetter135 W
Process node55 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU200 W—
Die size73 mm²Better335 mm²
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 0.06 MBL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
Transistor count242 million17200 millionBetter
Oyun FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100425425%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX10.112.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 2
Process node55 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20082021-05-31
Detailed specifications
Transistor count242 million17200 millionBetter
Die size73 mm²Better335 mm²
Shader units / Cores802304Better
Base clock600 MHz1489 MHzBetter
Boost clock600 MHz2400 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length——
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Recommended PSU200 W—
Power connectorNoneNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.0—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory512 MB DDR2Better10 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit160 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.09611.06Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI AÇIKLAMA · HEAD TO HEAD
Bu karşılaştırmayı açıkla
Yüzdelerin ötesinde: her grafiğin arkasındaki nedenler, ilgili özellikler ve pratik etki.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
GERÇEK SİSTEMLER
Kullanıcı deneyimleri
Gerçek sistemler, sonuçlar ve topluluk geri bildirimi.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Karşılaştırma hakkında sık sorulanlar
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 4350 or Radeon RX 6700M?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 4350 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.