TITAN XpVSRadeon RX Vega 56
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERTITAN Xp+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
TITAN Xp
VSWINNERTITAN Xp0%H2H overall index
AMD
RX Vega 56
Performans4841
Verimlilik6465
Price / Performance79100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4841
6465
79100
8068
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIATITAN Xp0No verified public setup yet
AMDRX Vega 560No verified public setup yet
KARŞILAŞTIRMA SONUCU
The devices received the same overall score
TITAN Xp leads in combined gaming performance. RX Vega 56 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RX Vega 56 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 131–136of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
TITAN Xp
0 beğeniHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX Vega 56
100/100 · Price $309The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GENEL PUAN
Genel bakış
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
44Better
36
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
64
65Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57
57
TAM KARŞILAŞTIRMA
Özellikler
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
Clock speed1480 - 1582 MHzBetter1156 - 1471 MHz
Base clock1480 MHzBetter1156 MHz
Boost clock1582 MHzBetter1471 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR5XBetter8 GB HBM2
Memory typeGDDR5XBetterHBM2
VRAM capacity12 GBBetter8 GB
Bellek frekansı11,4 GHzBetter1,6 GHz
Memory bus384 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth547 GB/sBetter410 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Power connector6+8 pin8+8 pinBetter
Power consumption250 W210 WBetter
TDP250 W210 WBetter
Process node16 nm14 nmBetter
Release date20162017Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS12.15Better10.54
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Oyun FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100484116%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100534614%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100574915%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100806816%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10064652%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100625316%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100615216%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100574915%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100655615%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100584917%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node16 nm14 nmBetter
Release date20162017Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1480 MHzBetter1156 MHz
Boost clock1582 MHzBetter1471 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6+8 pin8+8 pinBetter
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM12 GB GDDR5XBetter8 GB HBM2
Memory typeGDDR5XBetterHBM2
Memory bus384 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth547 GB/sBetter410 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Karşılaştırma hakkında sık sorulanlar
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: TITAN Xp or RX Vega 56?+
TITAN Xp has the higher overall gaming score, while RX Vega 56 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
TITAN Xp is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
TITAN Xp is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
TITAN Xp offers more overall performance, while TITAN Xp offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
TITAN Xp is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX Vega 56 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
TITAN Xp leads in combined 1440p performance. TITAN Xp can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
TITAN Xp is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX Vega 56 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX Vega 56 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to TITAN Xp if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.