Radeon 740M 8500GVSGeForce GTX 1630
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon 740M 8500G+44%Better gaming performance
AMD
740M 8500G
VSWINNER740M 8500G36%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1630
الأداء4632
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
4632
100100
المجتمع · بيانات موثقة
فتح إعدادات صناع البث→العتاد الذي يستخدمه صناع البث
إعدادات عامة حقيقية مرتبطة بكل جهاز.
AMD740M 8500G0لا يوجد إعداد عام موثق بعد
NVIDIAGTX 16300لا يوجد إعداد عام موثق بعد
نتيجة المقارنة
740M 8500G is the best overall choice
740M 8500G leads in combined gaming performance. 740M 8500G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
740M 8500G leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1630 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 60–65of 81
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 740M 8500G
0 إعجابHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1630
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
النتيجة الإجمالية
نظرة عامة
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
52
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
58
المقارنة الكاملة
المواصفات
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP—75 W
HDMI—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
DirectX—12.1
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
TFLOPS2.87Better1.828
Power connector—None
Power consumption—75 W
Process node4 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20232022
Architecture—Turing
Recommended PSU—250 W
Length—145 mm
Thickness—Single-slot
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price—$119
Transistor count—4700 million
Die size—200 mm²
Memory cache—L1 64 KB, L2 1 MB
Clock speed800 - 2800 MHz1740 - 1785 MHzBetter
Video memory- SMA4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory clock—12 GHz
Memory bus—64 bit
Bandwidth—96 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3x8
Shader units / Cores—512
Base clock800 MHz1740 MHzBetter
Boost clock2800 MHzBetter1785 MHz
إطارات الألعاب
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100463236%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100544030%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100464014%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100060200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10046452%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10046437%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100464014%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10046484%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100464111%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX—12.1
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Basic information
Architecture—Turing
Process node4 nmأفضل12 nm
Release date20232022
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count—4700 million
Die size—200 mm²
Shader units / Cores—512
Base clock800 MHz1740 MHzأفضل
Boost clock2800 MHzأفضل1785 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3x8
Length—145 mm
Thickness—Single-slot
Recommended PSU—250 W
Power connector—None
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory- SMA4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus—64 bit
TFLOPS2.87أفضل1.828
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6مقارنات أخرى
المراجعات والأسئلة
شرح الذكاء الاصطناعي · HEAD TO HEAD
اشرح هذه المقارنة
أبعد من النسب: الأسباب والمواصفات المهمة والأثر العملي خلف كل مخطط.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
تكوينات حقيقية
تجارب المالكين
تجميعات حقيقية ونتائج وآراء المجتمع.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
الأسئلة الشائعة عن المقارنة
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 740M 8500G or GTX 1630?+
740M 8500G has the higher overall gaming score, while 740M 8500G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1630 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1630 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
740M 8500G offers more overall performance, while 740M 8500G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1630 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
740M 8500G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
740M 8500G leads in combined 1440p performance. 740M 8500G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
740M 8500G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1630 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1630 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 740M 8500G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.