Radeon 760M 8600GVSRadeon RX 6750 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6750 XT+4%Better gaming performance
AMD
760M 8600G
VSWINNERRX 6750 XT4%Better gaming performance
AMD
RX 6750 XT
الأداء4850
Price / Performance10091
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Price / performance
4850
10091
المجتمع · بيانات موثقة
فتح إعدادات صناع البث→العتاد الذي يستخدمه صناع البث
إعدادات عامة حقيقية مرتبطة بكل جهاز.
AMD760M 8600G0لا يوجد إعداد عام موثق بعد
AMDRX 6750 XT0لا يوجد إعداد عام موثق بعد
نتيجة المقارنة
The devices received the same overall score
760M 8600G leads in combined gaming performance. 760M 8600G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
760M 8600G costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 51–56of 81
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 760M 8600G
0 إعجابHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon 760M 8600G
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
النتيجة الإجمالية
نظرة عامة
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48
50Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41
42Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39
40Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
54
67Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61
61
المقارنة الكاملة
المواصفات
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP—250 W
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
DirectX—12.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
TFLOPS5.3213.31Better
Clock speed800 - 2800 MHz2150 - 2600 MHzBetter
Video memory- SMA12 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory clock—18 GHz
Memory bus—192 bit
Bandwidth—432 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x16
Power connector—6+8 pin
Power consumption—250 W
Base clock800 MHz2150 MHzBetter
Boost clock2800 MHzBetter2600 MHz
Process node4 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20232022
Architecture—RDNA 2.0
Recommended PSU—600 W
Length—267 mm
Thickness—Dual-slot
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 2.1
Launch price—$549
Transistor count—17200 million
Die size—335 mm²
Shader units / Cores—2560
Memory cache—L1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
إطارات الألعاب
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10048504%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100485819%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100080200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100067200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100486327%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100486225%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100485819%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100486632%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100485921%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX—12.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
Architecture—RDNA 2.0
Process node4 nmأفضل7 nm
Release date20232022
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count—17200 million
Die size—335 mm²
Shader units / Cores—2560
Base clock800 MHz2150 MHzأفضل
Boost clock2800 MHzأفضل2600 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x16
Length—267 mm
Thickness—Dual-slot
Recommended PSU—600 W
Power connector—6+8 pin
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory- SMA12 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus—192 bit
TFLOPS5.3213.31أفضل
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6مقارنات أخرى
GTX 1630NVIDIAالمراجعات والأسئلة
شرح الذكاء الاصطناعي · HEAD TO HEAD
اشرح هذه المقارنة
أبعد من النسب: الأسباب والمواصفات المهمة والأثر العملي خلف كل مخطط.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
تكوينات حقيقية
تجارب المالكين
تجميعات حقيقية ونتائج وآراء المجتمع.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
الأسئلة الشائعة عن المقارنة
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 760M 8600G or RX 6750 XT?+
760M 8600G has the higher overall gaming score, while 760M 8600G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
760M 8600G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
760M 8600G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
760M 8600G offers more overall performance, while 760M 8600G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
760M 8600G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
760M 8600G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
760M 8600G leads in combined 1440p performance. 760M 8600G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
760M 8600G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6750 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6750 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 760M 8600G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.