ATI Radeon HD 4350VSRadeon RX 6700M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
🎮 In 0 Spielen getestet▣ 3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4K↗ Aktuelle Katalogdaten♢ Testing methodology
♜ SIEGERATI Radeon HD 4350+1%Bessere Gesamtleistung
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 4350
VSSIEGERATI Radeon HD 43500%H2H-Gesamtindex
AMD
Radeon RX 6700M
Leistung4052
Effizienz100100
Data confidence7560
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
4052
100100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIZIERTE DATEN
Streamer-Setups öffnen→Hardware von Streamern
Echte öffentliche Setups, die mit jedem Gerät verknüpft sind.
AMDATI Radeon HD 43500Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
AMDRadeon RX 6700M0Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
The devices received the same overall score
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined gaming performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6700M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 46–51of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 4350
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 4350
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40
52Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
35
44Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33
41Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63
63
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.0—
USB Type-C——
DirectX10.112.2Better
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL3.34.6Better
TFLOPS0.09611.06Better
TDP20 WBetter135 W
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6Better
Clock speed600 MHz1489–2400 MHzBetter
Base clock600 MHz1489 MHzBetter
Boost clock600 MHz2400 MHzBetter
Video memory512 MB DDR2Better10 GB GDDR6
Memory clock800 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Power connectorNoneNone
Release date20082021-05-31Better
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 2
Length——
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 2.1Better
Launch price$79—
Shader units / Cores802304Better
Memory bus64 bit160 bitBetter
Bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter320 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4.0 x16Better
Power consumption20 WBetter135 W
Process node55 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU200 W—
Die size73 mm²Better335 mm²
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 0.06 MBL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
Transistor count242 million17200 millionBetter
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100365745%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node——
Release date——
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock——
Boost clock——
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
Interface——
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector——
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM——
Memory type——
Memory bus——
Memory bandwidth——
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.0—
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX10.112.2Besser
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL3.34.6Besser
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
205NVIDIA
Arc A310IntelBewertungen und Fragen
KI-ERKLÄRUNG · HEAD TO HEAD
Diesen Vergleich erklären
Mehr als Prozentwerte: Ursachen, relevante Spezifikationen und praktische Auswirkungen hinter jedem Diagramm.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
ECHTE KONFIGURATIONEN
Erfahrungen von Besitzern
Echte Builds, Ergebnisse und Community-Feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 4350 or Radeon RX 6700M?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 4350 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.