Radeon RX 6700MVSGeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
🎮 In 0 Spielen getestet▣ 3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4K↗ Aktuelle Katalogdaten♢ Testing methodology
♜ SIEGERRadeon RX 6700M+1%Bessere Gesamtleistung
AMD
Radeon RX 6700M
VSSIEGERRadeon RX 6700M0%H2H-Gesamtindex
NVIDIA
RTX 3050 8 GB
Leistung5240
Effizienz100100
Data confidence6075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
5240
100100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIZIERTE DATEN
Streamer-Setups öffnen→Hardware von Streamern
Echte öffentliche Setups, die mit jedem Gerät verknüpft sind.
AMDRadeon RX 6700M0Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
NVIDIARTX 3050 8 GB0Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
The devices received the same overall score
Radeon RX 6700M leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 3050 8 GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6700M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 88–93of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6700M
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
100/100 · Price $299The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
52Better
40
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
44Better
35
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41Better
33
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63
63
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS11.06Better9.098
TDP135 W130 WBetter
ArchitectureRDNA 2Ampere
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
Launch price—$299
Shader units / Cores23042560Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x8
Power connectorNone8 pin
Release date2021-05-312022Better
Recommended PSU—300 W
Length—242 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Die size335 mm²Better276 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Clock speed1489–2400 MHz1552 - 1777 MHzBetter
Base clock1489 MHz1552 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1777 MHz
Video memory10 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
VRAM capacity10 GBBetter8 GB
Memory clock2000 MHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus160 bitBetter128 bit
Bandwidth320 GB/sBetter224 GB/s
Power consumption135 WBetter130 W
Process node7 nm8 nmBetter
Transistor count17200 millionBetter12000 million
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100574328%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node——
Release date——
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock——
Boost clock——
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
Interface——
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector——
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM——
Memory type——
Memory bus——
Memory bandwidth——
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
Arc A310IntelBewertungen und Fragen
KI-ERKLÄRUNG · HEAD TO HEAD
Diesen Vergleich erklären
Mehr als Prozentwerte: Ursachen, relevante Spezifikationen und praktische Auswirkungen hinter jedem Diagramm.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
ECHTE KONFIGURATIONEN
Erfahrungen von Besitzern
Echte Builds, Ergebnisse und Community-Feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6700M or RTX 3050 8 GB?+
Radeon RX 6700M has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 8 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6700M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6700M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6700M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6700M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6700M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6700M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.