H2H

Apple M2 UltraVSIntel Core i9-14901TE

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Catalog benchmarks3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Apple M2 Ultra
♜ WINNERApple M2 Ultra+2%Better overall performance
Intel Core i9-14901TE
AppleM2 Ultra

$0.00Average price

VS

$0.00Average price

IntelCore i9-14901TE
VS
WINNERM2 Ultra2%Better overall performance
Performance5858
Efficiency6663
Data confidence2538

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Core i9-14901TE: key takeaway

The comparison of M2 Ultra and Core i9-14901TE shows a 0% advantage for M2 Ultra in gaming performance, while Core i9-14901TE may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

M2 UltraApple M2 UltraApple
Core i9-14901TEIntel Core i9-14901TEIntel
H2H
Performance
Single-core
Efficiency
Performance
5858
Single-core
5892
Efficiency
6663
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

M2 Ultra is the best overall choice

M2 Ultra leads in overall performance, while M2 Ultra offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

M2 Ultra leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$0

Prices are identical

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares M2 Ultra and Core i9-14901TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryM2 UltraCore i9-14901TE
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
58
58
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
48
48
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46
46
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
66Better
63
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
59
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares M2 Ultra and Core i9-14901TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationM2 UltraCore i9-14901TE
Device classDesktopDesktop
Release date2023-06-052023
Cores / Threads24 / 24Better8P / 16
Clock speedUp to 3.5 GHzBetterP 2,3 - 5,5 GHz
Base clock2300 MHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz5500 MHzBetter
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache36 MB
Memory supportUnified memory, LPDDR5, up to 192 GB, 800 GB/sDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
Integrated graphicsApple 60-core / 76-core GPUUHD 770 1,65 GHzBetter
PBP / MTP70 / 110 WBetter45 / 115 W
Power consumption110 W45 / 115 WBetter
PassMark26472
SocketLGA1700
ArchitectureRaptor Lake Refresh
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares M2 Ultra and Core i9-14901TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexM2 UltraCore i9-14901TEDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100589245%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10058615%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10001100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares M2 Ultra and Core i9-14901TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexM2 UltraCore i9-14901TEDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100584134%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100584525%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100583452%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100584721%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100584427%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AM2 Ultra60
Device BCore i9-14901TE59
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: M2 Ultra or Core i9-14901TE?

M2 Ultra has the higher overall gaming score, while M2 Ultra offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

M2 Ultra is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

M2 Ultra is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

M2 Ultra offers more overall performance, while M2 Ultra offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

M2 Ultra is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

M2 Ultra is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

M2 Ultra leads in combined 1440p performance. M2 Ultra can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

M2 Ultra is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

M2 Ultra is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

M2 Ultra is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to M2 Ultra if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.