
Apple M2 UltraVSAMD Ryzen 7 9700X
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
Apple
M2 Ultra

VSWINNERM2 Ultra0%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen 7 9700X

Performance5858
Efficiency6669
Data confidence2538
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Apple M2 Ultra vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X: key takeaway
The comparison of M2 Ultra and Ryzen 7 9700X shows a 0% advantage for M2 Ultra in gaming performance, while Ryzen 7 9700X may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Apple
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Efficiency
5858
5892
6669
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
M2 Ultra leads in overall performance, while M2 Ultra offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
M2 Ultra costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares M2 Ultra and Ryzen 7 9700X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
58
58
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
48
48
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46
46
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
66
69Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60
60
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares M2 Ultra and Ryzen 7 9700X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
Release date2023-06-052024
Cores / Threads24 / 24Better8 / 16
Clock speedUp to 3.5 GHz3,8 - 5,5 GHzBetter
Base clock—3800 MHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz5500 MHzBetter
L1 cache——
L2 cache——
L3 cache—32 MB
Memory supportUnified memory, LPDDR5, up to 192 GB, 800 GB/sDDR5-5600
Integrated graphicsApple 60-core / 76-core GPUBetterNavi II 2CU 2,2 GHz
PBP / MTP70 / 110 WBetter65/105 W
Power consumption110 W65/105 WBetter
PassMark—37395
Socket—AM5
Architecture—Granite Ridge
Process node—4 nm
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares M2 Ultra and Ryzen 7 9700X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100589245%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10058615%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10001100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares M2 Ultra and Ryzen 7 9700X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100584134%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100584525%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100583452%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100584721%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100584427%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: M2 Ultra or Ryzen 7 9700X?+
M2 Ultra has the higher overall gaming score, while M2 Ultra offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
M2 Ultra is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
M2 Ultra is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
M2 Ultra offers more overall performance, while M2 Ultra offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
M2 Ultra is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
M2 Ultra is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
M2 Ultra leads in combined 1440p performance. M2 Ultra can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
M2 Ultra is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
M2 Ultra is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
M2 Ultra is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to M2 Ultra if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.
