H2H

Intel Core i7-14700KFVSIntel Core Ultra 5 235A

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Catalog benchmarks3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core i7-14700KF
♜ WINNERIntel Core i7-14700KF+1%Better overall performance
Intel Core Ultra 5 235A
IntelCore i7-14700KF

$389.00Average price

VS

$0.00Average price

IntelCore Ultra 5 235A
VS
WINNERCore i7-14700KF0%Better overall performance
Performance5952
Efficiency2954
Data confidence3838

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core i7-14700KF vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235A: key takeaway

The comparison of Core i7-14700KF and Core Ultra 5 235A shows a 13% advantage for Core i7-14700KF in gaming performance, while Core Ultra 5 235A may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Core i7-14700KFIntel Core i7-14700KFIntel
Core Ultra 5 235AIntel Core Ultra 5 235AIntel
H2H
Performance
Single-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
5952
Single-core
9383
L3 cache
10
Efficiency
2954
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

The devices received the same overall score

Core i7-14700KF leads in overall performance, while Core i7-14700KF offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE$389

Core Ultra 5 235A costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core i7-14700KF and Core Ultra 5 235A with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore i7-14700KFCore Ultra 5 235A
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
59Better
52
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
49Better
44
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46Better
41
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
29
54Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52
52
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core i7-14700KF and Core Ultra 5 235A with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore i7-14700KFCore Ultra 5 235A
Release date20232024
L2 cache
L1 cache
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark53276Better38392
ArchitectureRaptor Lake RefreshArrow Lake
PBP / MTP125 / 253 WBetter65 / 121 W
Power consumption125 / 253 W65 / 121 WBetter
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)3 nmBetter
Cores / Threads8P+12E / 28Better6P+8E / 14
Clock speedP 3,4 - 5,6 GHz / E 2,5 - 4,3 GHzP 3,4 - 5 GHz / E 2,9 - 4,4 GHz
SocketLGA1700LGA1851Better
Base clock3400 MHz3400 MHz
Boost clock5600 MHzBetter5000 MHz
L3 cache33 MBBetter24 MB
Memory supportDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-6400
Integrated graphicsArc Xe2 24 2 GHz
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core i7-14700KF and Core Ultra 5 235A with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i7-14700KFCore Ultra 5 235ADifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100938311%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100625610%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core i7-14700KF and Core Ultra 5 235A with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i7-14700KFCore Ultra 5 235ADifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100413710%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100464111%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100343013%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100474211%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100443912%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i7-14700KF52
Device BCore Ultra 5 235A52
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i7-14700KF or Core Ultra 5 235A?

Core i7-14700KF has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i7-14700KF offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i7-14700KF is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i7-14700KF is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i7-14700KF offers more overall performance, while Core i7-14700KF offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i7-14700KF is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i7-14700KF is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i7-14700KF leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i7-14700KF can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i7-14700KF is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i7-14700KF is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i7-14700KF is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i7-14700KF if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.