H2H

Intel Core i9-13900KSVSIntel Core i5-13500T

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Catalog benchmarks3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core i9-13900KS
♜ WINNERIntel Core i9-13900KS+8%Better overall performance
Intel Core i5-13500T
IntelCore i9-13900KS

$657.00Average price

VS

$0.00Average price

IntelCore i5-13500T
VS
WINNERCore i9-13900KS7%Better overall performance
Performance6348
Efficiency3165
Data confidence3838

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core i9-13900KS vs Intel Core i5-13500T: key takeaway

The comparison of Core i9-13900KS and Core i5-13500T shows a 31% advantage for Core i9-13900KS in gaming performance, while Core i5-13500T may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Core i9-13900KSIntel Core i9-13900KSIntel
Core i5-13500TIntel Core i5-13500TIntel
H2H
Performance
Single-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
6348
Single-core
10077
L3 cache
10
Efficiency
3165
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Core i9-13900KS is the best overall choice

Core i9-13900KS leads in overall performance, while Core i9-13900KS offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE8%

Core i9-13900KS leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$657

Core i5-13500T costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core i9-13900KS and Core i5-13500T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore i9-13900KSCore i5-13500T
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
63Better
48
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
52Better
41
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
39
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
31
65Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
56Better
52
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core i9-13900KS and Core i5-13500T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore i9-13900KSCore i5-13500T
Release date20222022
L1 cache
L2 cache
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark61889Better23658
Cores / Threads8P+16E / 32Better6P+8E / 20
PBP / MTP150 / 253 WBetter35 / 92 W
Clock speedP 3,2 - 6 GHz / E 2,4 - 4,4 GHzBetterP 1,6 - 4,6 GHz / E 1,2 - 3,2 GHz
Base clock3200 MHzBetter1600 MHz
Boost clock6000 MHzBetter4600 MHz
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
ArchitectureRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
L3 cache36 MBBetter24 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 770 1,65 GHzUHD 770 1,55 GHz
Power consumption150 / 253 W35 / 92 WBetter
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
Memory supportDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core i9-13900KS and Core i5-13500T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i9-13900KSCore i5-13500TDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 1001007726%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100675127%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core i9-13900KS and Core i5-13500T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i9-13900KSCore i5-13500TDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100443426%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100493825%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100372828%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100513829%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100473627%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i9-13900KS56
Device BCore i5-13500T52
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-13900KS or Core i5-13500T?

Core i9-13900KS has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i9-13900KS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i9-13900KS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i9-13900KS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i9-13900KS offers more overall performance, while Core i9-13900KS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i9-13900KS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i9-13900KS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i9-13900KS leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-13900KS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i9-13900KS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i9-13900KS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i9-13900KS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i9-13900KS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.