Intel Core Ultra 7 165ULVSAMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core Ultra 7 165UL+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core Ultra 7 165UL
VSWINNERCore Ultra 7 165UL0%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen 3 8300G
Performance5151
Efficiency10098
Data confidence3838
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Intel Core Ultra 7 165UL vs AMD Ryzen 3 8300G: key takeaway
The comparison of Core Ultra 7 165UL and Ryzen 3 8300G shows a 0% advantage for Core Ultra 7 165UL in gaming performance, while Ryzen 3 8300G may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelAMDPerformance
Single-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
5151
8282
00
10098
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Core Ultra 7 165UL leads in overall performance, while Core Ultra 7 165UL offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core Ultra 7 165UL and Ryzen 3 8300G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
51
51
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
43
43
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41
41
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
98
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62
62
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core Ultra 7 165UL and Ryzen 3 8300G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Release date20232024
L1 cache——
L2 cache——
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark—13990
PBP / MTP15 / 57 W65 WBetter
Cores / Threads2P+8E+2L / 14Better1P+3E / 8
SocketLGA1851BetterAM5
ArchitectureMeteor Lake-PSPhoenix 2
Clock speedP 1,7 - 4,9 GHz / E 1,2 - 3,8 GHz / L 0,7 - 2,1 GHzP 3,4 - 4,9 GHz / E 3,2 - 3,6 GHzBetter
Base clock1700 MHz3400 MHzBetter
Boost clock4900 MHz4900 MHz
L3 cache12 MBBetter8 MB
Integrated graphicsArc Xe 64 2 GHzRadeon 740M 2,6 GHzBetter
Power consumption15 / 57 WBetter65 W
Process node7 nm4 nmBetter
Memory supportDDR5-5600DDR5-5200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core Ultra 7 165UL and Ryzen 3 8300G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10082820%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10055542%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core Ultra 7 165UL and Ryzen 3 8300G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10040400%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10030300%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10041410%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core Ultra 7 165UL or Ryzen 3 8300G?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL has the higher overall gaming score, while Core Ultra 7 165UL offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL offers more overall performance, while Core Ultra 7 165UL offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL leads in combined 1440p performance. Core Ultra 7 165UL can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core Ultra 7 165UL is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core Ultra 7 165UL if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.