H2H

Radeon 740M 8300GVSRadeon RX 9070 GRE 16GB

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Radeon 740M 8300G
♜ WINNERRadeon 740M 8300G+1%Better overall performance
Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16GB
AMD740M 8300G

$0.00Average price

VS

$0.00Average price

AMDRX 9070 GRE 16GB
VS
WINNER740M 8300G1%H2H overall index
Performance7566
Data confidence2560

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

740M 8300GRadeon 740M 8300GAMD
RX 9070 GRE 16GBRadeon RX 9070 GRE 16GBAMD
H2H
Performance
Performance
7566
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Radeon 740M 8300GAMD740M 8300G0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16GBAMDRX 9070 GRE 16GB0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
COMPARISON RESULT

740M 8300G is the best overall choice

740M 8300G leads in combined gaming performance. 740M 8300G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE1%

740M 8300G leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$0

Prices are identical

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 4–9of 328
740M 8300G#6position in the GPU ranking
RX 9070 GRE 16GB#8position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon 740M 8300G

0 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon 740M 8300G

0/100 · Price $0

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

Category740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GB
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
75Better
66
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
60
60
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
58Better
52
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
68
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
75Better
74
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

Specification740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GB
Clock speed800 - 2600 MHz1420 - 2790 MHzBetter
Base clock800 MHz1420 MHzBetter
Boost clock2600 MHz2790 MHzBetter
VRAM- SMA16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
VRAM capacity-16 GB
Memory frequency-18 GHz
Memory bus-256 bit
Memory bandwidth576 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5x16
Power connector-8+8 pin
Power consumption-220 W
TDP-220 W
Process node4 nmBetter5 nm
Release date20232025Better
Architecture
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Maximum displays
Maximum resolution
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
TFLOPS
Launch price
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache

Gaming FPS

Loading test-rig results…

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

Index740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GBDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100756613%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10077735%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10075724%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100088200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

Index740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GBDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10075761%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10075750%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10075724%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10075784%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10075733%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

Basic information

Specifications740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GB
Architecture
Process node4 nmBetter5 nm
Release date20232025Better
Launch price

Detailed specifications

Specifications740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GB
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Base clock800 MHz1420 MHzBetter
Boost clock2600 MHz2790 MHzBetter

Form factor and compatibility

Specifications740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GB
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5x16
Length
Thickness
Recommended PSU
Power connector-8+8 pin

VRAM capacity and type

Specifications740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GB
VRAM- SMA16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus-256 bit
Memory bandwidth576 GB/s
Memory cache

Connectivity and outputs

Specifications740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GB
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Maximum displays
Maximum resolution

API and SDK compatibility

Specifications740M 8300GRX 9070 GRE 16GB
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device A740M 8300G75
Device BRX 9070 GRE 16GB74
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: 740M 8300G or RX 9070 GRE 16GB?

740M 8300G has the higher overall gaming score, while 740M 8300G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

740M 8300G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

740M 8300G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

740M 8300G offers more overall performance, while RX 9070 GRE 16GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 9070 GRE 16GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

740M 8300G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

740M 8300G leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9070 GRE 16GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

740M 8300G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 9070 GRE 16GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 9070 GRE 16GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to 740M 8300G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.