Intel Arc A310VSRadeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx+33%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc A310
VSWINNERNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx29%Better gaming performance
AMD
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Performance3344
Price / performance100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Intel Arc A310 vs Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx: key takeaway
The comparison of Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx shows a 33% advantage for Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx in gaming performance, while Arc A310 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
3344
100100
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A310 leads in combined game performance. Arc A310 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 56–61of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A310
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
100/100 · Price $89The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
33
44Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
30
38Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
HDMIHDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.03x DisplayPort 1.4a
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS2.688Better0.56
Power consumption75 W—
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
UpscalingXeSSFSR
Power connectorNone—
Release date20222022
ArchitectureXe-HPGNot publicly specified
Clock speed1750 - 2000 MHzBetter400 - 2200 MHz
Base clock1750 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2000 MHz2200 MHzBetter
VRAM4 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory frequency15,5 GHz—
Memory bus64 bit—
Memory bandwidth124 GB/s—
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
Power consumption75 W—
Process node6 nm6 nm
Recommended PSU200 WVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$169—
Shader units / cores768Not publicly specified
Die size157 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL2 4 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count7200 millionNot publicly specified
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A310Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
20 FPSEstimated 64%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
17 FPSEstimated 64%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
9 FPSEstimated 58%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: Wukong20Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Call of Duty: Warzone20Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2165Estimated 72%182Estimated 74%116Estimated 72%128Estimated 74%62Estimated 66%99Estimated 74%22Estimated 62%49Estimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077106Estimated 72%117Estimated 74%92Estimated 72%101Estimated 74%45Estimated 66%72Estimated 74%15Estimated 62%33Estimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5134Estimated 78%148Estimated 80%87Estimated 72%96Estimated 74%56Estimated 66%89Estimated 74%33Estimated 62%72Estimated 74%
God of War Ragnarök20Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Hogwarts Legacy87Estimated 72%96Estimated 74%73Estimated 72%80Estimated 74%41Estimated 66%64Estimated 74%15Estimated 62%34Estimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202420Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Monster Hunter Wilds20Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Starfield20Estimated 64%22Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100334429%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100424915%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10041447%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100600200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10045442%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10044440%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10041447%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10048449%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10041447%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureXe-HPGNot publicly specified
Process node6 nm6 nm
Release date20222022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count7200 millionNot publicly specified
Die size157 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores768Not publicly specified
Base clock1750 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2000 MHz2200 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU200 WVaries by board
Power connectorNone—
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.03x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc A310 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM4 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus64 bit—
TFLOPS2.688Better0.56
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
GTX 1630NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A310 or Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx?+
Arc A310 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A310 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A310 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A310 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A310 offers more overall performance, while Arc A310 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A310 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A310 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A310 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A310 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A310 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A310 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A310 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A310 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.