ATI Radeon HD 3730VSGeForce RTX 3090
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERATI Radeon HD 3730+1%Better overall performance
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 3730
VSWINNERATI Radeon HD 37300%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
RTX 3090
Performance4263
Efficiency10060
Price / Performance10071
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4263
10060
10071
13100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDATI Radeon HD 37300No verified public setup yet
NVIDIARTX 30900No verified public setup yet
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
ATI Radeon HD 3730 leads in combined gaming performance. ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
ATI Radeon HD 3730 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 67–72of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 3730
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 3730
100/100 · Price $59The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
42
63Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
100Better
65
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
49Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64
64
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Clock speed722 MHz1395 - 1695 MHzBetter
Base clock722 MHz1395 MHzBetter
Boost clock722 MHz1695 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better24 GB GDDR6X
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6XBetter
VRAM capacity512 MBBetter24 GB
Memory frequency792 МгцBetter19,5 GHz
Memory bus128 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth12672 GB/sBetter936 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16Better
Power connector-16 pin
Power consumption65 WBetter350 W
TDP65 WBetter350 W
Process node55 nm8 nmBetter
Release date20082020Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS0.17335.58Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100426340%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100356864%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100347373%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10013100154%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006050%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100298094%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100307889%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100347373%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1002683105%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100337477%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node55 nm8 nmBetter
Release date20082020Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock722 MHz1395 MHzBetter
Boost clock722 MHz1695 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16Better
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector-16 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better24 GB GDDR6X
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6XBetter
Memory bus128 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth12672 GB/sBetter936 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 3730 or RTX 3090?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3090 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3090 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3090 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 3730 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 3730 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.