GeForce GTX 1650VSGeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GTX 1650+2%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1650
VSWINNERGTX 16502%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
RTX 3050 6 GB
Performance3434
Efficiency100100
Price / Performance10097
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIANVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3434
100100
10097
5660
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIAGTX 16500No verified public setup yet
NVIDIARTX 3050 6 GB0No verified public setup yet
COMPARISON RESULT
GTX 1650 is the best overall choice
GTX 1650 leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1650 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1650 leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1650 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 120–125of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1650
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
34
34
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28
29Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1485 - 1665 MHzBetter1042 - 1470 MHz
Base clock1485 MHzBetter1042 MHz
Boost clock1665 MHzBetter1470 MHz
VRAM4 GB GDDR56 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6Better
VRAM capacity4 GB6 GBBetter
Memory frequency8 GHz14 GHzBetter
Memory bus128 bitBetter96 bit
Memory bandwidth128 GB/s168 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x8Better
Power connector--
Power consumption75 W70 WBetter
TDP75 W70 WBetter
Process node12 nm8 nmBetter
Release date20192024Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS2.9846.774Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10034340%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10040400%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10040412%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10044464%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10043455%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10040412%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10040425%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node12 nm8 nmBetter
Release date20192024Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1485 MHzBetter1042 MHz
Boost clock1665 MHzBetter1470 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x8Better
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM4 GB GDDR56 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6Better
Memory bus128 bitBetter96 bit
Memory bandwidth128 GB/s168 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
740M 8300GAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1650 or RTX 3050 6 GB?+
GTX 1650 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1650 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1650 offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1650 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1650 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 6 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1650 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1650 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.