Intel Iris Xe DG1VSGeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Iris Xe DG1+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Iris Xe DG1
VSWINNERIris Xe DG10%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
RTX 3050 6 GB
Performance3234
Efficiency100100
Price / Performance10097
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3234
100100
10097
5060
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelIris Xe DG10No verified public setup yet
NVIDIARTX 3050 6 GB0No verified public setup yet
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Iris Xe DG1 leads in combined gaming performance. Iris Xe DG1 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Iris Xe DG1 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 125–130of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Iris Xe DG1
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Iris Xe DG1
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
34Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
26
29Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
28Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed900 - 1650 MHz1042 - 1470 MHzBetter
Base clock900 MHz1042 MHzBetter
Boost clock1650 MHzBetter1470 MHz
VRAM4 GB LPDDR4X6 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6Better
VRAM capacity4 GB6 GBBetter
Memory frequency4,3 GHz14 GHzBetter
Memory bus128 bitBetter96 bit
Memory bandwidth69 GB/s168 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Power connector--
Power consumption30 WBetter70 W
TDP30 WBetter70 W
Process node10 nm8 nmBetter
Release date20222024Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS2.536.774Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032346%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10038405%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100374110%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100506018%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100404614%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100394514%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100374110%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100424915%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100374213%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node10 nm8 nmBetter
Release date20222024Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock900 MHz1042 MHzBetter
Boost clock1650 MHzBetter1470 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM4 GB LPDDR4X6 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6Better
Memory bus128 bitBetter96 bit
Memory bandwidth69 GB/s168 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
740M 8300GAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Iris Xe DG1 or RTX 3050 6 GB?+
Iris Xe DG1 has the higher overall gaming score, while Iris Xe DG1 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Iris Xe DG1 offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Iris Xe DG1 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 6 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Iris Xe DG1 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Iris Xe DG1 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Iris Xe DG1 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.