Intel Arc A770MVSRadeon RX 6800M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A770M+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Intel Arc A770M
VSWINNERIntel Arc A770M0%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6800M
Performance5454
Efficiency100100
Data confidence6060
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5454
100100
8880
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→What streamers use
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelIntel Arc A770M0No verified public setup yet
AMDRadeon RX 6800M0No verified public setup yet
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Intel Arc A770M leads in combined gaming performance. Intel Arc A770M offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 71–76of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770M
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A770M
0/100 · Price $0The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
54
54
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45
45
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
43
43
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64
64
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS16.79Better12.24
TDP120 WBetter145 W
ArchitectureXe HPG (Alchemist)RDNA 2
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Launch price——
Shader units / Cores4096Better2560
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Die size406 mm²335 mm²Better
Memory cacheL2 16 MBBetterL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
Clock speed1650–2050 MHz2116–2390 MHzBetter
Base clock1650 MHz2116 MHzBetter
Boost clock2050 MHz2390 MHzBetter
Video memory16 GB GDDR6Better12 GB GDDR6
Transistor count21700 millionBetter17200 million
Power connector—None
Release date2022-01-012021-05-31
Recommended PSU——
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Memory clock2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
Bandwidth512 GB/sBetter384 GB/s
Power consumption120 WBetter145 W
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Gaming FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10054540%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10061622%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10064615%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100888010%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10069664%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10068646%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10064615%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10073687%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10064623%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureXe HPG (Alchemist)RDNA 2
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2022-01-012021-05-31
Detailed specifications
Transistor count21700 millionBetter17200 million
Die size406 mm²335 mm²Better
Shader units / Cores4096Better2560
Base clock1650 MHz2116 MHzBetter
Boost clock2050 MHz2390 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Recommended PSU——
Power connector—None
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory16 GB GDDR6Better12 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
TFLOPS16.79Better12.24
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Intel Arc A770M or Radeon RX 6800M?+
Intel Arc A770M has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Arc A770M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Intel Arc A770M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Intel Arc A770M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Intel Arc A770M offers more overall performance, while Intel Arc A770M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Intel Arc A770M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Intel Arc A770M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Intel Arc A770M leads in combined 1440p performance. Intel Arc A770M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Intel Arc A770M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A770M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A770M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Intel Arc A770M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.