H2H

Intel Core i9-13900EVSIntel Core I9-10900E

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core i9-13900E
♜ WINNERIntel Core i9-13900E+2%Better overall performance
Intel Core I9-10900E
IntelCore i9-13900E

0,00 €Average price

VS

0,00 €Average price

IntelCore I9-10900E
VS
WINNERCore i9-13900E2%H2H overall index
Performances6548
Efficacité3792
Data confidence6262

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Core i9-13900EIntel Core i9-13900EIntel
Core I9-10900EIntel Core I9-10900EIntel
H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
6548
Single-core
8778
Multi-core
7348
L3 cache
10
Efficiency
3792
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Intel Core i9-13900EIntelCore i9-13900E0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
Intel Core I9-10900EIntelCore I9-10900E0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON

Core i9-13900E is the best overall choice

Core i9-13900E leads in overall performance, while Core i9-13900E offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

Core i9-13900E leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE0 €

Prices are identical

NOTE GLOBALE

Aperçu

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryCore i9-13900ECore I9-10900E
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
65Better
48
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
53Better
41
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
51Better
39
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
37
92Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
58
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE

Caractéristiques

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationCore i9-13900ECore I9-10900E
PassMark34049Better19595
Cœurs / threads8P+16E / 3210 / 20Better
Clock speedP 1,8 - 5,2 GHz / E 1,3 - 4 GHz2,8 - 4,7 GHzBetter
Base clock1800 MHz2800 MHzBetter
Boost clock5200 MHzBetter4700 MHz
Кэш32+36 MBBetter20 MB
Кэш L336 MBBetter20 MB
SocketLGA1700BetterLGA1200
Встроенная графикаUHD 770 1,65 GHzBetterUHD 630 1,2 GHz
PBP / MTP65 / 219 W65 W
Power consumption65 / 219 W65 W
Поддержка памятиDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-2933
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)Better14 nm
ArchitectureRaptor LakeComet Lake
Кодовое имяRaptor LakeComet Lake
Release date
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexCore i9-13900ECore I9-10900EDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100877811%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100734841%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100665028%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100583842%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexCore i9-13900ECore I9-10900EDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100463430%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100513829%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100382830%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100523831%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100493631%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i9-13900E59
Device BCore I9-10900E58
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-13900E or Core I9-10900E?

Core i9-13900E has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i9-13900E offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i9-13900E is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i9-13900E is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i9-13900E offers more overall performance, while Core i9-13900E offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i9-13900E is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i9-13900E is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i9-13900E leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-13900E can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i9-13900E is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i9-13900E is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i9-13900E is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i9-13900E if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.