Intel Arc A770VSIntel Arc B770
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A770+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Arc A770
VSWINNERArc A7700%H2H overall index
Intel
Arc B770
Performances5959
Efficacité8787
Price / Performance10099
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5959
8787
10099
8888
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelArc A7700No verified public setup yet
IntelArc B7700No verified public setup yet
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A770 leads in combined gaming performance. Arc A770 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Arc A770 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 16–21of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770
0 J’aimeHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A770
100/100 · Price $329The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
NOTE GLOBALE
Aperçu
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
59
59
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
55
55
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46
46
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
87
87
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72
72
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE
Caractéristiques
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Memory cache——
Clock speed2100 - 2400 MHz2100 - 2400 MHz
Base clock2100 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHz2400 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity16 GB16 GB
Fréquence mémoire16 GHz16 GHz
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s512 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Power connector8+8 pinBetter6+8 pin
Power consumption225 W225 W
TDP225 W225 W
Process node6 nm5 nmBetter
Release date20222026Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS19.6628Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
FPS en jeu
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10059590%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10067670%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10067670%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10087870%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10072720%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10071710%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10067670%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10075750%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Informations de base
Architecture——
Process node6 nm5 nmMeilleur
Release date20222026Meilleur
Launch price——
Caractéristiques détaillées
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock2100 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHz2400 MHz
Format et compatibilité
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8+8 pinMeilleur6+8 pin
Capacité et type de VRAM
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s512 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivité et sorties
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
Compatibilité API et SDK
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Autres comparaisons
205NVIDIA
740M 8300GAMDAvis et questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A770 or Arc B770?+
Arc A770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A770 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A770 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A770 offers more overall performance, while Arc A770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A770 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.