ATI Radeon HD 3730VSIntel Arc A380
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERATI Radeon HD 3730+2%Better overall performance
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 3730
VSWINNERATI Radeon HD 37302%H2H overall index
Intel
Arc A380
Performances4241
Efficacité100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4241
100100
100100
1360
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDATI Radeon HD 37300No verified public setup yet
IntelArc A3800No verified public setup yet
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the best overall choice
ATI Radeon HD 3730 leads in combined gaming performance. ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
ATI Radeon HD 3730 leads in the combined performance index
ATI Radeon HD 3730 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 67–72of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 3730
0 J’aimeHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 3730
100/100 · Price $59The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
NOTE GLOBALE
Aperçu
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
42Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
100Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
63
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE
Caractéristiques
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Clock speed722 MHzBetter300 - 2000 MHz
Base clock722 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock722 MHz2000 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6Better
VRAM capacity512 MBBetter6 GB
Fréquence mémoire792 МгцBetter15,5 GHz
Memory bus128 bitBetter96 bit
Memory bandwidth12672 GB/sBetter186 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x8Better
Power connector-6 pin
Power consumption65 WBetter75 W
TDP65 WBetter75 W
Process node55 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20082022Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS0.1734.198Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS en jeu
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10042412%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100354831%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100344630%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001360129%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100295053%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100304948%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100344630%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100265267%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100334735%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Informations de base
Architecture——
Process node55 nm6 nmMeilleur
Release date20082022Meilleur
Launch price——
Caractéristiques détaillées
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock722 MHzMeilleur300 MHz
Boost clock722 MHz2000 MHzMeilleur
Format et compatibilité
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x8Meilleur
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector-6 pin
Capacité et type de VRAM
VRAM512 MB DDR2Meilleur6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6Meilleur
Memory bus128 bitMeilleur96 bit
Memory bandwidth12672 GB/sMeilleur186 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivité et sorties
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
Compatibilité API et SDK
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Autres comparaisons
205NVIDIAAvis et questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 3730 or Arc A380?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 3730 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 3730 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.