GeForce GTX 1630VSGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GTX 1630+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1630
VSWINNERGTX 16300%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
GTX 1650 GDDR6
Performances3636
Efficacité100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIANVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3636
100100
100100
6060
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIAGTX 16300No verified public setup yet
NVIDIAGTX 1650 GDDR60No verified public setup yet
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON
The devices received the same overall score
GTX 1630 leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1630 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
GTX 1630 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 113–118of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1630
0 J’aimeHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1630
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
NOTE GLOBALE
Aperçu
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60
60
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE
Caractéristiques
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Clock speed1740 - 1785 MHzBetter1410 - 1590 MHz
Base clock1740 MHzBetter1410 MHz
Boost clock1785 MHzBetter1590 MHz
VRAM4 GB GDDR64 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity4 GB4 GB
Fréquence mémoire12 GHz12 GHz
Memory bus64 bit128 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s192 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 3x16
Power connector--
Power consumption75 W75 W
TDP75 W75 W
Process node12 nm12 nm
Release date2022Better2020
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS1.8282.849Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS en jeu
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10043422%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10047470%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10046460%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Informations de base
Architecture——
Process node12 nm12 nm
Release date2022Meilleur2020
Launch price——
Caractéristiques détaillées
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1740 MHzMeilleur1410 MHz
Boost clock1785 MHzMeilleur1590 MHz
Format et compatibilité
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
Capacité et type de VRAM
VRAM4 GB GDDR64 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit128 bitMeilleur
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s192 GB/sMeilleur
Memory cache——
Connectivité et sorties
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
Compatibilité API et SDK
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Autres comparaisons
740M 8300GAMDAvis et questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1630 or GTX 1650 GDDR6?+
GTX 1630 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1630 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1630 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1630 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1630 offers more overall performance, while GTX 1630 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1630 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1630 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1630 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1630 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1630 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1630 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1630 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1630 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.