Radeon RX 6800MVSIntel Arc A770M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
🎮 Testé dans 0 jeux▣ 3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4K↗ Données actuelles du catalogue♢ Testing methodology
♜ VAINQUEURRadeon RX 6800M+3%Meilleures performances globales
AMD
Radeon RX 6800M
VSVAINQUEURRadeon RX 6800M3%Indice global H2H
Intel
Intel Arc A770M
Performances5149
Efficacité100100
Data confidence4545
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDIntelPerformance
Efficiency
5149
100100
COMMUNAUTÉ · DONNÉES VÉRIFIÉES
Ouvrir les setups de streamers→Matériel utilisé par les streamers
Configurations publiques réelles liées à chaque appareil.
AMDRadeon RX 6800M0Aucun setup public vérifié pour l’instant
IntelIntel Arc A770M0Aucun setup public vérifié pour l’instant
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON
Radeon RX 6800M is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 6800M leads in combined gaming performance. Radeon RX 6800M offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 6800M leads in the combined performance index
Prices are identical
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 80–85of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800M
0 J’aimeHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 6800M
0/100 · Price $0The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
NOTE GLOBALE
Aperçu
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
51Better
49
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
43Better
42
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41Better
39
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
60
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE
Caractéristiques
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS12.2416.79Better
TDP145 W120 WBetter
ArchitectureRDNA 2Xe HPG (Alchemist)
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Launch price——
Shader units / Cores25604096Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power connectorNone—
Release date2021-05-312022-01-01
Recommended PSU——
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Die size335 mm²Better406 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL2 16 MBBetter
Clock speed2116–2390 MHzBetter1650–2050 MHz
Base clock2116 MHzBetter1650 MHz
Boost clock2390 MHzBetter2050 MHz
Video memory12 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
Bandwidth384 GB/s512 GB/sBetter
Power consumption145 W120 WBetter
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Transistor count17200 million21700 millionBetter
FPS en jeu
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10056527%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 2Xe HPG (Alchemist)
Process node7 nm6 nmMeilleur
Release date2021-05-312022-01-01
Detailed specifications
Transistor count17200 million21700 millionMeilleur
Die size335 mm²Meilleur406 mm²
Shader units / Cores25604096Meilleur
Base clock2116 MHzMeilleur1650 MHz
Boost clock2390 MHzMeilleur2050 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Recommended PSU——
Power connectorNone—
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory12 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6Meilleur
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bit256 bitMeilleur
TFLOPS12.2416.79Meilleur
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Autres comparaisons
205NVIDIAAvis et questions
EXPLICATION IA · HEAD TO HEAD
Expliquer cette comparaison
Au-delà des pourcentages : causes, caractéristiques pertinentes et impact pratique derrière chaque graphique.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
CONFIGURATIONS RÉELLES
Expériences des propriétaires
Configurations réelles, résultats et retours de la communauté.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6800M or Intel Arc A770M?+
Radeon RX 6800M has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon RX 6800M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 6800M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 6800M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6800M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6800M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 6800M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon RX 6800M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6800M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6800M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6800M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A770M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A770M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6800M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.