GeForce RTX 4070 SUPERVSRadeon Pro W6800
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER+10%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
RTX 4070 SUPER
VSWINNERRTX 4070 SUPER9%H2H overall index
AMD
Pro W6800
Performances5860
Efficacité8880
Price / Performance7954
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5860
8880
7954
80100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIARTX 4070 SUPER0No verified public setup yet
AMDPro W68000No verified public setup yet
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON
RTX 4070 SUPER is the best overall choice
RTX 4070 SUPER leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 4070 SUPER offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 4070 SUPER leads in the combined performance index
RTX 4070 SUPER costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 46–51of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
0 J’aimeHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
79/100 · Price $599The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
NOTE GLOBALE
Aperçu
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
58
60Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51
69Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46
47Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
88Better
80
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
68Better
62
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE
Caractéristiques
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1980 - 2475 MHz2075 - 2320 MHzBetter
Base clock1980 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock2475 MHzBetter2320 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6X32 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
VRAM capacity12 GB32 GBBetter
Fréquence mémoire21 GHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth504 GB/s512 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Power connector16 pinBetter6+8 pin
Power consumption220 WBetter250 W
TDP220 WBetter250 W
Process node5 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2024Better2021
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS35.48Better17.83
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS en jeu
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10058603%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10065696%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100647110%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008010022%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100888010%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100687814%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100677613%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100647110%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100708216%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100657210%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Informations de base
Architecture——
Process node5 nmMeilleur7 nm
Release date2024Meilleur2021
Launch price——
Caractéristiques détaillées
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1980 MHz2075 MHzMeilleur
Boost clock2475 MHzMeilleur2320 MHz
Format et compatibilité
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector16 pinMeilleur6+8 pin
Capacité et type de VRAM
VRAM12 GB GDDR6X32 GB GDDR6Meilleur
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Memory bus192 bit256 bitMeilleur
Memory bandwidth504 GB/s512 GB/sMeilleur
Memory cache——
Connectivité et sorties
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
Compatibilité API et SDK
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Autres comparaisons
Avis et questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4070 SUPER or Pro W6800?+
RTX 4070 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 4070 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4070 SUPER offers more overall performance, while Pro W6800 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4070 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. Pro W6800 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4070 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.