Radeon RX 7600M XTVSRadeon RX 7700S
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
🎮 Testé dans 0 jeux▣ 3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4K↗ Données actuelles du catalogue♢ Testing methodology
♜ VAINQUEURRadeon RX 7600M XT+1%Meilleures performances globales
AMD
Radeon RX 7600M XT
VSVAINQUEURRadeon RX 7600M XT0%Indice global H2H
AMD
Radeon RX 7700S
Performances4949
Efficacité100100
Data confidence4545
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
4949
100100
COMMUNAUTÉ · DONNÉES VÉRIFIÉES
Ouvrir les setups de streamers→Matériel utilisé par les streamers
Configurations publiques réelles liées à chaque appareil.
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT0Aucun setup public vérifié pour l’instant
AMDRadeon RX 7700S0Aucun setup public vérifié pour l’instant
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON
The devices received the same overall score
Radeon RX 7600M XT leads in combined gaming performance. Radeon RX 7600M XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 89–94of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600M XT
0 J’aimeHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7600M XT
0/100 · Price $0The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
NOTE GLOBALE
Aperçu
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
49
49
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42
42
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39
39
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60
60
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE
Caractéristiques
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS20.2320.48Better
TDP120 W100 WBetter
ArchitectureRDNA 3RDNA 3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.2
Launch price——
Shader units / Cores20482048
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power connectorNoneNone
Release date2023-01-042023-01-04
Recommended PSU——
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Die size204 mm²204 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Clock speed1280–2469 MHz1500–2500 MHzBetter
Base clock1280 MHz1500 MHzBetter
Boost clock2469 MHz2500 MHzBetter
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory clock2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Bandwidth288 GB/s288 GB/s
Power consumption120 W100 WBetter
Process node6 nm6 nm
Transistor count13300 million13300 million
FPS en jeu
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10055550%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.2
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3RDNA 3
Process node6 nm6 nm
Release date2023-01-042023-01-04
Detailed specifications
Transistor count13300 million13300 million
Die size204 mm²204 mm²
Shader units / Cores20482048
Base clock1280 MHz1500 MHzMeilleur
Boost clock2469 MHz2500 MHzMeilleur
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Recommended PSU——
Power connectorNoneNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS20.2320.48Meilleur
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Autres comparaisons
205NVIDIAAvis et questions
EXPLICATION IA · HEAD TO HEAD
Expliquer cette comparaison
Au-delà des pourcentages : causes, caractéristiques pertinentes et impact pratique derrière chaque graphique.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
CONFIGURATIONS RÉELLES
Expériences des propriétaires
Configurations réelles, résultats et retours de la communauté.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7600M XT or Radeon RX 7700S?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon RX 7600M XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7600M XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7600M XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7700S is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7700S is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7600M XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.