Intel
Intel Celeron G5930 vs Apple M6
Perbandingan lengkap spesifikasi, performa, dan benchmark
Apple
M6
Skor performa agregat
Kami membandingkan Celeron G5930 dan M6 berdasarkan spesifikasi dan pengujian relevan.
↗Celeron G5930 unggul 289600% atas M6 menurut indeks agregat Head to Head.+289600%
Skor dinormalisasi pada skala Head to Head. Lebih tinggi lebih baik.Intel Celeron G5930 vs Apple M6: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Celeron G5930 dan M6 menunjukkan keunggulan 200% untuk Celeron G5930 pada «performa gaming», sementara M6 bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
Intel
ApplePerforma
20
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Celeron G5930 adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan
Celeron G5930 unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Celeron G5930 menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Celeron G5930 unggul pada indeks performa gabungan
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Celeron G5930 dan M6 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
2Lebih baik
0
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
8Lebih baik
6
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
5Lebih baik
4
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
4Lebih baik
1
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
2Lebih baik
0
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Celeron G5930 dan M6 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20172026
Device classDesktopApple
PassMark2896N/A
PBP / MTP58 WNot applicable (Apple SoC)
Cores / Threads212 / 12Lebih baik
SoketLGA1200Integrated Apple SoC
ArsitekturComet LakeApple M6
Kecepatan clock3,7 GHzNot published by Apple
Clock dasar3700 MHzNot published by Apple
Boost clock3700 MHzNot published by Apple
Cache L164 KB per coreLebih baikApple core-type L1 cache (varies by core)
Cache L2256 KB per coreLebih baikApple shared L2 cache by CPU cluster
Cache L32 MBN/A
Grafis terintegrasiUHD 610 1,05 GHzLebih baikApple 12-core GPU with Neural Accelerators
Konsumsi daya58 WN/A
Node proses14 nm2 nmLebih baik
Dukungan memoriDDR4-2666Unified memory, up to 32 GB, up to 170 GB/sLebih baik
CPU configuration—2 super cores + 4 performance cores + 6 efficiency cores
Neural Engine—Dual 16-core Neural Engine
Release status—Released
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Celeron G5930 dan M6 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100620200%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10060200%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100220200%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10050200%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Celeron G5930 dan M6 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10020200%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10020200%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10020200%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Celeron G5930 or M6?+
Celeron G5930 has the higher overall gaming score, while Celeron G5930 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Celeron G5930 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Celeron G5930 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Celeron G5930 offers more overall performance, while Celeron G5930 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Celeron G5930 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Celeron G5930 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Celeron G5930 leads in combined 1440p performance. Celeron G5930 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Celeron G5930 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Celeron G5930 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Celeron G5930 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Celeron G5930 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.