Intel
Intel Core i9-13900K vs Apple M4
Perbandingan lengkap spesifikasi, performa, dan benchmark
Apple
M4
Skor performa agregat
Kami membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan M4 berdasarkan spesifikasi dan pengujian relevan.
↗Core i9-13900K unggul 168% atas M4 menurut indeks agregat Head to Head.+168%
Skor dinormalisasi pada skala Head to Head. Lebih tinggi lebih baik.Intel Core i9-13900K vs Apple M4: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Core i9-13900K dan M4 menunjukkan keunggulan 179% untuk Core i9-13900K pada «performa gaming», sementara M4 bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
Intel
ApplePerforma
Single-core
Multi-core
Efisiensi
3914
9773
8137
1970
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Core i9-13900K adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan
Core i9-13900K unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core i9-13900K menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Core i9-13900K unggul pada indeks performa gabungan
Core i9-13900K lebih murah
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan M4 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
39Lebih baik
14
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
34Lebih baik
16
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
32Lebih baik
14
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
19
70Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
35Lebih baik
27
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan M4 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20222024
Device classDesktopMobile
PassMark59448Lebih baik22180
PBP / MTP125 / 253 WLebih baik15 / 25 W
Cores / Threads8P+16E / 3210 / 10Lebih baik
SoketLGA1700—
ArsitekturRaptor Lake—
Kecepatan clockP 3 - 5,8 GHz / E 2,2 - 4,3 GHzUp to 4.4 GHzLebih baik
Clock dasar3000 MHz—
Boost clock5800 MHzLebih baik4.4 GHz
Cache L180 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-coreLebih baikApple core-type L1 cache (varies by P/E core)
Cache L22 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core clusterApple shared L2 cache by core cluster
Cache L336 MB—
Grafis terintegrasiUHD 770 1,65 GHzLebih baikApple 10-core GPU
Konsumsi daya125 / 253 W25 WLebih baik
Node proses10 nm (Intel 7)—
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200Unified memory, up to 32 GB, 120 GB/sLebih baik
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan M4 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100977328%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100813775%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100745039%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100653755%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan M4 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100281467%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100311476%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100231449%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100311476%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100291470%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-13900K or M4?+
Core i9-13900K has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i9-13900K offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core i9-13900K is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core i9-13900K is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core i9-13900K offers more overall performance, while Core i9-13900K offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core i9-13900K is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core i9-13900K is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core i9-13900K leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-13900K can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core i9-13900K is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core i9-13900K is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core i9-13900K is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core i9-13900K if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.