H2H

AMD PRO A10-8770 vs Apple M6

Perbandingan lengkap spesifikasi, performa, dan benchmark

Skor performa agregat

Kami membandingkan PRO A10-8770 dan M6 berdasarkan spesifikasi dan pengujian relevan.

PRO A10-8770 unggul 369700% atas M6 menurut indeks agregat Head to Head.+369700%

Skor dinormalisasi pada skala Head to Head. Lebih tinggi lebih baik.
ANALISIS CEPAT

AMD PRO A10-8770 vs Apple M6: kesimpulan utama

Perbandingan PRO A10-8770 dan M6 menunjukkan keunggulan 200% untuk PRO A10-8770 pada «performa gaming», sementara M6 bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.

PROFIL RINGKAS

Radar metrik terverifikasi

Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.

H2H
Performa
Performa
20
Nilai yang hilang tidak pernah diganti dengan nol atau rata-rata.Model: skala tetap H2H 2026.07.
HASIL PERBANDINGAN

PRO A10-8770 adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan

PRO A10-8770 unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara PRO A10-8770 menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.

SELISIH PERFORMA200%

PRO A10-8770 unggul pada indeks performa gabungan

SKOR KESELURUHAN

Ringkasan

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan PRO A10-8770 dan M6 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

CategoryPRO A10-8770M6
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
2Lebih baik
0
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
8Lebih baik
6
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
5Lebih baik
4
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
4Lebih baik
1
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
2Lebih baik
0
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP

Spesifikasi

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan PRO A10-8770 dan M6 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

SpecificationPRO A10-8770M6
Tanggal rilis20152026
Device classDesktopApple
PassMark3697N/A
PBP / MTP65 WNot applicable (Apple SoC)
Dukungan memoriDDR4-2400Unified memory, up to 32 GB, up to 170 GB/sLebih baik
Cores / Threads412 / 12Lebih baik
SoketAM4Integrated Apple SoC
ArsitekturCarrizoApple M6
Kecepatan clock3,5 - 3,8 GHzNot published by Apple
Clock dasar3500 MHzNot published by Apple
Boost clock3800 MHzNot published by Apple
Cache L180 KB per moduleLebih baikApple core-type L1 cache (varies by core)
Cache L21 MB per moduleApple shared L2 cache by CPU clusterLebih baik
Cache L32 MBN/A
Grafis terintegrasiR7 1 GHzApple 12-core GPU with Neural AcceleratorsLebih baik
Konsumsi daya65 WN/A
Node proses28 nm2 nmLebih baik
CPU configuration2 super cores + 4 performance cores + 6 efficiency cores
Neural EngineDual 16-core Neural Engine
Release statusReleased
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload H2H

Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.

Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan PRO A10-8770 dan M6 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksPRO A10-8770M6Selisih
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100630200%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100130200%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100260200%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100100200%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload AI H2H

Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.

Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan PRO A10-8770 dan M6 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksPRO A10-8770M6Selisih
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10020200%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10020200%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10020200%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD

Jelaskan perbandingan ini

Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.

Perangkat APRO A10-87702
Perangkat BM60
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI

Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.

KONFIGURASI NYATA

Pengalaman pemilik

Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.

Ditinjau moderatorBermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Pertanyaan umum perbandingan

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: PRO A10-8770 or M6?

PRO A10-8770 has the higher overall gaming score, while PRO A10-8770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

PRO A10-8770 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

PRO A10-8770 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

PRO A10-8770 offers more overall performance, while PRO A10-8770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

PRO A10-8770 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

PRO A10-8770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

PRO A10-8770 leads in combined 1440p performance. PRO A10-8770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

PRO A10-8770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

PRO A10-8770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

PRO A10-8770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to PRO A10-8770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.