AMD
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
Perbandingan lengkap spesifikasi, performa, dan benchmark
AMD
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
Skor performa agregat
Kami membandingkan Ryzen Threadripper 1950 dan Ryzen Threadripper 1940X berdasarkan spesifikasi dan pengujian relevan.
↗Ryzen Threadripper 1950 unggul 7% atas Ryzen Threadripper 1940X menurut indeks agregat Head to Head.+7%
Skor dinormalisasi pada skala Head to Head. Lebih tinggi lebih baik.AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Ryzen Threadripper 1950 dan Ryzen Threadripper 1940X menunjukkan keunggulan 7% untuk Ryzen Threadripper 1950 pada «performa gaming», sementara Ryzen Threadripper 1940X bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
AMDPerforma
Single-core
Multi-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
1615
6267
6057
11
1110
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Ryzen Threadripper 1950 menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 unggul pada indeks performa gabungan
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 lebih murah
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Ryzen Threadripper 1950 dan Ryzen Threadripper 1940X dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
16Lebih baik
15
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
18Lebih baik
17
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
16Lebih baik
15
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
11Lebih baik
10
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
15Lebih baik
14
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Ryzen Threadripper 1950 dan Ryzen Threadripper 1940X dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20172017
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark25278Lebih baik23606
PBP / MTP180 W180 W
Cores / Threads16 / 32Lebih baik14 / 28
SoketTR4TR4
ArsitekturWhitehavenWhitehaven
Dukungan memoriDDR4-2666 4 channelsDDR4-2666 4 channels
Kecepatan clock3,2 - 3,7 GHz3,5 - 4 GHzLebih baik
Clock dasar3200 MHz3500 MHzLebih baik
Boost clock3700 MHz4000 MHzLebih baik
Cache L196 KB per core96 KB per core
Cache L2512 KB per core512 KB per core
Cache L332 MB32 MB
Grafis terintegrasiTidakTidak
Konsumsi daya180 W180 W
Node proses14 nm14 nm
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Ryzen Threadripper 1950 dan Ryzen Threadripper 1940X dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10062678%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10060575%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10052512%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10048464%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Ryzen Threadripper 1950 dan Ryzen Threadripper 1940X dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10011110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10013128%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10010911%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10013128%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10012119%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 or Ryzen Threadripper 1940X?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers more overall performance, while Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen Threadripper 1950 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Ryzen Threadripper 1950 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.