Intel Core 7 251TEVSIntel Core i9-13900KS
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core 7 251TE+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core 7 251TE
VSWINNERCore 7 251TE0%H2H overall index
Intel
Core i9-13900KS
性能6876
効率6338
Data confidence6262
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelIntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
6876
90100
7684
11
6338
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelCore 7 251TE0No verified public setup yet
IntelCore i9-13900KS0No verified public setup yet
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
Core 7 251TE leads in overall performance, while Core 7 251TE offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Core 7 251TE costs less
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
68
76Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
55
61Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
53
59Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63Better
38
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67
67
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
PassMark3002261889Better
コア / スレッド8P+16E / 328P+16E / 32
Clock speedP 1,4 - 5,4 GHz / E 1 - 3,9 GHzP 3,2 - 6 GHz / E 2,4 - 4,4 GHzBetter
Base clock1400 MHz3200 MHzBetter
Boost clock5400 MHz6000 MHzBetter
Кэш26+36 MB32+36 MBBetter
Кэш L336 MB36 MB
ソケットLGA1700LGA1700
Встроенная графикаUHD 770 1,6 GHzUHD 770 1,65 GHz
PBP / MTP45 / 135 W150 / 253 WBetter
Power consumption45 / 135 WBetter150 / 253 W
Поддержка памятиDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
ArchitectureBartlett LakeRaptor Lake
Кодовое имяBartlett LakeRaptor Lake
Release date——
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 1009010011%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100768410%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100697610%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10061679%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100485310%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100535911%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100404410%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100556110%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100515711%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 7 251TE or Core i9-13900KS?+
Core 7 251TE has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 7 251TE offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 7 251TE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 7 251TE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 7 251TE offers more overall performance, while Core 7 251TE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 7 251TE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 7 251TE is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 7 251TE leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 7 251TE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 7 251TE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 7 251TE is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 7 251TE is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 7 251TE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.