H2H

Ryzen 7 4800UVSAMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Ryzen 7 4800U
♜ WINNERRyzen 7 4800U+1%Better overall performance
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
AMDRyzen 7 4800U

¥0Average price

VS

¥0Average price

AMDRyzen 9 3950X
VS
WINNERRyzen 7 4800U1%H2H overall index
性能7066
Data confidence2562

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Ryzen 7 4800URyzen 7 4800UAMD
Ryzen 9 3950XAMD Ryzen 9 3950XAMD
H2H
Performance
Single-core
Performance
7066
Single-core
7078
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Ryzen 7 4800UAMDRyzen 7 4800U0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 3950XAMDRyzen 9 3950X0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
比較結果

Ryzen 7 4800U is the best overall choice

Ryzen 7 4800U leads in overall performance, while Ryzen 7 4800U offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE1%

Ryzen 7 4800U leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE¥0

Prices are identical

総合スコア

概要

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRyzen 7 4800URyzen 9 3950X
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
70Better
66
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
57Better
54
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
54Better
52
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63
79Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70Better
69
完全比較

仕様

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRyzen 7 4800URyzen 9 3950X
СерияRyzen 4000
ArchitectureZen 2Matisse
Кодовое имяRenoirMatisse
Год выпуска2020
Ядра8
Потоки16
Base clock1.8 GHz3500 MHzBetter
Boost clock4.2 GHz4700 MHzBetter
Встроенная графикаRadeon Vega 8-
Форм-факторMobile
PassMark38807
コア / スレッド16 / 32
Clock speed3,5 - 4,7 GHz
Кэш8+64 MB
Кэш L364 MB
ソケットAM4
PBP / MTP105 W
Power consumption105 W
Поддержка памятиDDR4-3200
Process node7 nm
Release date
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRyzen 7 4800URyzen 9 3950XDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100707811%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100076200%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10070666%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100061200%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRyzen 7 4800URyzen 9 3950XDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100704739%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100705230%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100703957%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100705328%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100705033%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARyzen 7 4800U70
Device BRyzen 9 3950X69
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

比較に関するよくある質問

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen 7 4800U or Ryzen 9 3950X?

Ryzen 7 4800U has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen 7 4800U offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Ryzen 7 4800U is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Ryzen 7 4800U is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Ryzen 7 4800U offers more overall performance, while Ryzen 7 4800U offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Ryzen 7 4800U is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Ryzen 7 4800U is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Ryzen 7 4800U leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen 7 4800U can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Ryzen 7 4800U is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Ryzen 9 3950X is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Ryzen 9 3950X is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Ryzen 7 4800U if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.