AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900VSIntel Xeon W-1290T
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
VSWINNERRyzen 9 PRO 39000%H2H overall index
Intel
Xeon W-1290T
性能5048
効率96100
Data confidence6262
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDIntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
5048
7278
5248
10
96100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRyzen 9 PRO 39000No verified public setup yet
IntelXeon W-1290T0No verified public setup yet
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 leads in overall performance, while Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
48
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
41
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
39
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
96
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60
60
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
PassMark31609Better18409
コア / スレッド12 / 24Better10 / 20
Clock speed3,1 - 4,3 GHzBetter1,9 - 4,7 GHz
Base clock3100 MHzBetter1900 MHz
Boost clock4300 MHz4700 MHzBetter
Кэш6+64 MB20 MBBetter
Кэш L364 MBBetter20 MB
ソケットAM4LGA1200Better
Встроенная графика-UHD P630 1,2 GHz
PBP / MTP65 WBetter35 W
Power consumption65 W35 WBetter
Поддержка памятиDDR4-3200DDR4-2933
Process node7 nmBetter14 nm
ArchitectureMatisseComet Lake
Кодовое имяMatisseComet Lake
Release date——
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10072788%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10052488%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10051502%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100423810%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10035343%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039383%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10030287%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10040385%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10038365%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 or Xeon W-1290T?+
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers more overall performance, while Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Xeon W-1290T is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Xeon W-1290T is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.