ATI Radeon HD 4350VSRadeon RX 6700M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERATI Radeon HD 4350+1%Better overall performance
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 4350
VSWINNERATI Radeon HD 43500%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6700M
性能4052
効率100100
Data confidence7560
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4052
100100
1374
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→ストリーマーの使用機材
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDATI Radeon HD 43500No verified public setup yet
AMDRadeon RX 6700M0No verified public setup yet
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined gaming performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6700M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 78–83of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 4350
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 4350
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40
52Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
100Better
45
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39
47Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63
63
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed600 MHz1489–2400 MHzBetter
Base clock600 MHz1489 MHzBetter
Boost clock600 MHz2400 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better10 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6Better
VRAM capacity512 MBBetter10 GB
メモリクロック800 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Memory bus64 bit160 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter320 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4.0 x16Better
Power connectorNoneNone
Power consumption20 WBetter135 W
TDP20 WBetter135 W
Process node55 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20082021-05-31Better
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 2
Recommended PSU200 W—
Length——
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
HDMI——
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.0—
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX10.112.2Better
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL3.34.6Better
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 2.1Better
TFLOPS0.09611.06Better
Launch price$79—
Transistor count242 million17200 millionBetter
Die size73 mm²335 mm²Better
Shader units / cores802304Better
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 0.06 MBL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
Тип GPUДискретныйDiscrete
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100405226%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100336058%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100325858%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001374140%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100286276%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100296171%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100325858%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100256488%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100325959%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
基本情報
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 2
Process node55 nm7 nm優位
Release date20082021-05-31優位
Launch price$79—
詳細仕様
Transistor count242 million17200 million優位
Die size73 mm²335 mm²優位
Shader units / cores802304優位
Base clock600 MHz1489 MHz優位
Boost clock600 MHz2400 MHz優位
フォームファクターと互換性
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4.0 x16優位
Length——
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Recommended PSU200 W—
Power connectorNoneNone
VRAM容量とタイプ
VRAM512 MB DDR2優位10 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6優位
Memory bus64 bit160 bit優位
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/s優位320 GB/s
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 0.06 MBL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
接続と出力
HDMI——
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.0—
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
APIとSDKの互換性
DirectX10.112.2優位
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL3.34.6優位
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 2.1優位
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
205NVIDIAレビューと質問
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
所有者の体験
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 4350 or Radeon RX 6700M?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4350 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 4350 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 4350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 4350 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.