GeForce GT 1030VSRadeon RX 470 8GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GT 1030+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GT 1030
VSWINNERGT 10300%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 470 8GB
性能3033
効率10092
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3033
10092
100100
5668
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIAGT 10300No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 470 8GB0No verified public setup yet
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
GT 1030 leads in combined gaming performance. GT 1030 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
GT 1030 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 127–132of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GT 1030
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GT 1030
100/100 · Price $89The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30
33Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
23
30Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
28Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
92
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57
57
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1227 - 1519 MHzBetter926 - 1206 MHz
Base clock1227 MHzBetter926 MHz
Boost clock1519 MHzBetter1206 MHz
VRAM2 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
VRAM capacity2 GB8 GBBetter
メモリクロック6 GHz6,6 GHzBetter
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s211 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x4PCIe 3x16
Power connector-8 pin
Power consumption30 WBetter120 W
TDP30 WBetter120 W
Process node16 nm14 nmBetter
Release date2017Better2016
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS1.1274.94Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100303310%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10037395%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100374315%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100566819%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100100928%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100424915%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100404716%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100374315%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100445217%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100384415%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
基本情報
Architecture——
Process node16 nm14 nm優位
Release date2017優位2016
Launch price——
詳細仕様
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1227 MHz優位926 MHz
Boost clock1519 MHz優位1206 MHz
フォームファクターと互換性
InterfacePCIe 3x4PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector-8 pin
VRAM容量とタイプ
VRAM2 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR5優位
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus64 bit256 bit優位
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s211 GB/s優位
Memory cache——
接続と出力
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
APIとSDKの互換性
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
レビューと質問
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 1030 or RX 470 8GB?+
GT 1030 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 1030 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 1030 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 1030 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 1030 offers more overall performance, while RX 470 8GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 1030 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 1030 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 1030 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 470 8GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 1030 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 1030 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 1030 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 1030 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.