GeForce GTX 1650VSRadeon RX 7600S
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GTX 1650+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1650
VSWINNERGTX 16500%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 7600S
性能3144
効率100100
Data confidence6045
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
3144
100100
コミュニティ · 検証済みデータ
ストリーマー構成を開く→ストリーマーが使うハードウェア
各デバイスに紐づく実際の公開セットアップ。
NVIDIAGTX 16500検証済み公開構成はまだありません
AMDRadeon RX 7600S0検証済み公開構成はまだありません
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
GTX 1650 leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1650 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 7600S costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 121–126of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1650
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
44Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
38Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57
57
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP75 W75 W
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS2.98415.77Better
Max monitors——
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Clock speed1485 - 1665 MHz1500–2200 MHzBetter
Base clock1485 MHz1500 MHzBetter
Boost clock1665 MHz2200 MHzBetter
Video memory4 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock8 GHz2000 MHzBetter
Power connectorNoneNone
Release date20192023-01-04
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 3
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Bandwidth128 GB/s256 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power consumption75 W75 W
Process node12 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 W—
Length229 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$169—
Shader units / Cores8961792Better
Die size200 mm²Better204 mm²
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Transistor count4700 million13300 millionBetter
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100314435%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100354933%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100314435%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100314435%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100314435%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100314435%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100314435%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100314435%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.2
Basic information
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 3
Process node12 nm6 nm優位
Release date20192023-01-04
Detailed specifications
Transistor count4700 million13300 million優位
Die size200 mm²優位204 mm²
Shader units / Cores8961792優位
Base clock1485 MHz1500 MHz優位
Boost clock1665 MHz2200 MHz優位
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU250 W—
Power connectorNoneNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory4 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR6優位
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS2.98415.77優位
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
レビューと質問
AI解説 · HEAD TO HEAD
この比較を説明
パーセンテージだけでなく、各グラフの理由・関連仕様・実用上の影響を解説します。
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
実際の構成
所有者の体験
実際の構成、結果、コミュニティのフィードバック。
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1650 or Radeon RX 7600S?+
GTX 1650 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1650 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1650 offers more overall performance, while GTX 1650 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1650 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1650 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1650 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1650 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1650 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1650 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1650 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.