GeForce GTX 1650VSRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GTX 1650+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1650
VSWINNERGTX 16500%H2H overall index
AMD
Vega Frontier Edition
性能3448
効率10053
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3448
10053
100100
5688
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIAGTX 16500No verified public setup yet
AMDVega Frontier Edition0No verified public setup yet
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
GTX 1650 leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1650 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
GTX 1650 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 120–125of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1650
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
34
48Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28
47Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28
39Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
53
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59
59
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1485 - 1665 MHzBetter1440 - 1600 MHz
Base clock1485 MHzBetter1440 MHz
Boost clock1665 MHzBetter1600 MHz
VRAM4 GB GDDR516 GB HBM2Better
Memory typeGDDR5BetterHBM2
VRAM capacity4 GB16 GBBetter
メモリクロック8 GHzBetter1,89 GHz
Memory bus128 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth128 GB/s484 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Power connector-8+8 pin
Power consumption75 WBetter300 W
TDP75 WBetter300 W
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Release date2019Better2017
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS2.98413.11Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100344834%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100405532%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100405938%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100568844%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005361%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100446640%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100436439%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100405938%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100467041%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100406040%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
基本情報
Architecture——
Process node12 nm優位14 nm
Release date2019優位2017
Launch price——
詳細仕様
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1485 MHz優位1440 MHz
Boost clock1665 MHz優位1600 MHz
フォームファクターと互換性
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector-8+8 pin
VRAM容量とタイプ
VRAM4 GB GDDR516 GB HBM2優位
Memory typeGDDR5優位HBM2
Memory bus128 bit2048 bit優位
Memory bandwidth128 GB/s484 GB/s優位
Memory cache——
接続と出力
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
APIとSDKの互換性
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
レビューと質問
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1650 or Vega Frontier Edition?+
GTX 1650 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1650 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1650 offers more overall performance, while Vega Frontier Edition offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1650 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1650 leads in combined 1440p performance. Vega Frontier Edition can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1650 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1650 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1650 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1650 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.