Intel Arc A770MVSRadeon RX 6800M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A770M+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Intel Arc A770M
VSWINNERIntel Arc A770M0%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6800M
性能5454
効率100100
Data confidence6060
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5454
100100
8880
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→ストリーマーの使用機材
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelIntel Arc A770M0No verified public setup yet
AMDRadeon RX 6800M0No verified public setup yet
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
Intel Arc A770M leads in combined gaming performance. Intel Arc A770M offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 71–76of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770M
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A770M
0/100 · Price $0The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
54
54
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
52Better
48
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49
49
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64
64
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Тип GPUDiscreteDiscrete
ArchitectureXe HPG (Alchemist)RDNA 2
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0BetterOpenCL 2.1
TFLOPS16.79Better12.24
Launch price——
Transistor count21700 millionBetter17200 million
Die size406 mm²Better335 mm²
Shader units / cores4096Better2560
Memory cacheL2 16 MBBetterL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock speed1650–2050 MHz2116–2390 MHzBetter
Base clock1650 MHz2116 MHzBetter
Boost clock2050 MHz2390 MHzBetter
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better12 GB GDDR6
VRAM capacity16 GBBetter12 GB
メモリクロック2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sBetter384 GB/s
Power connector—None
Power consumption120 WBetter145 W
TDP120 WBetter145 W
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2022-01-01Better2021-05-31
Recommended PSU——
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10054540%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10061622%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10064615%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100888010%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10069664%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10068646%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10064615%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10073687%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10064623%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
基本情報
ArchitectureXe HPG (Alchemist)RDNA 2
Process node6 nm優位7 nm
Release date2022-01-01優位2021-05-31
Launch price——
詳細仕様
Transistor count21700 million優位17200 million
Die size406 mm²優位335 mm²
Shader units / cores4096優位2560
Base clock1650 MHz2116 MHz優位
Boost clock2050 MHz2390 MHz優位
フォームファクターと互換性
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Recommended PSU——
Power connector—None
VRAM容量とタイプ
VRAM16 GB GDDR6優位12 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit優位192 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s優位384 GB/s
Memory cacheL2 16 MB優位L1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
接続と出力
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
APIとSDKの互換性
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0優位OpenCL 2.1
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
205NVIDIAレビューと質問
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
所有者の体験
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Intel Arc A770M or Radeon RX 6800M?+
Intel Arc A770M has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Arc A770M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Intel Arc A770M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Intel Arc A770M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Intel Arc A770M offers more overall performance, while Intel Arc A770M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Intel Arc A770M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Intel Arc A770M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Intel Arc A770M leads in combined 1440p performance. Intel Arc A770M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Intel Arc A770M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A770M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A770M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Intel Arc A770M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.