Radeon RX 6700MVSGeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6700M+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6700M
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6700M0%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
性能5248
効率10071
Data confidence6075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5248
10071
7468
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→ストリーマーの使用機材
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRadeon RX 6700M0No verified public setup yet
NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X0No verified public setup yet
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
Radeon RX 6700M leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6700M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 80–85of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6700M
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
100/100 · Price $399The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
52Better
48
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45Better
41
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
45
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
71
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63
63
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
ArchitectureRDNA 2Ampere
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Тип GPUDiscreteДискретный
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
TFLOPS11.0616.2Better
Launch price—$399
Transistor count17200 million17400 millionBetter
Die size335 mm²392 mm²Better
Shader units / cores23044864Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 128 KB, L2 4 MB
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Clock speed1489–2400 MHzBetter1410 - 1665 MHz
Base clock1489 MHzBetter1410 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1665 MHz
VRAM10 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6X
VRAM capacity10 GBBetter8 GB
メモリクロック2000 MHzBetter19 GHz
Memory bus160 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s608 GB/sBetter
Power connectorNone8 pin
Power consumption135 WBetter225 W
TDP135 WBetter225 W
Process node7 nmBetter8 nm
Release date2021-05-312022Better
Recommended PSU—550 W
Length—242 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10052488%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100605214%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10058547%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10074688%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007134%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10062578%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10061569%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10058547%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10064598%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10059549%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
基本情報
ArchitectureRDNA 2Ampere
Process node7 nm優位8 nm
Release date2021-05-312022優位
Launch price—$399
詳細仕様
Transistor count17200 million17400 million優位
Die size335 mm²392 mm²優位
Shader units / cores23044864優位
Base clock1489 MHz優位1410 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHz優位1665 MHz
フォームファクターと互換性
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—242 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSU—550 W
Power connectorNone8 pin
VRAM容量とタイプ
VRAM10 GB GDDR6優位8 GB GDDR6X
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus160 bit256 bit優位
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s608 GB/s優位
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 128 KB, L2 4 MB
接続と出力
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
APIとSDKの互換性
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
レビューと質問
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
所有者の体験
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6700M or RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X?+
Radeon RX 6700M has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6700M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6700M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6700M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6700M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6700M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6700M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6700M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6700M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.