GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERVSRadeon RX 7600M XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7600M XT+9%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 2060 SUPER
VSWINNERRadeon RX 7600M XT9%Better gaming performance
AMD
Radeon RX 7600M XT
性能4448
効率84100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4448
84100
6868
コミュニティ · 検証済みデータ
ストリーマー構成を開く→ストリーマーが使うハードウェア
各デバイスに紐づく実際の公開セットアップ。
NVIDIARTX 2060 SUPER0検証済み公開構成はまだありません
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT0検証済み公開構成はまだありません
比較結果
RTX 2060 SUPER is the best overall choice
RTX 2060 SUPER leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 2060 SUPER offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 2060 SUPER leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 7600M XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 55–60of 81
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
100/100 · Price $399The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44
48Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38
41Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36
39Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
84
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
60
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP175 W120 WBetter
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS7.18120.23Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8 pinNone
Release date20192023-01-04
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 3
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$399—
Shader units / Cores2176Better2048
Clock speed1470 - 1650 MHzBetter1280–2469 MHz
Base clock1470 MHzBetter1280 MHz
Boost clock1650 MHz2469 MHzBetter
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory clock14 GHz2250 MHzBetter
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
Bandwidth448 GB/sBetter288 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power consumption175 W120 WBetter
Process node12 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU450 W—
Length229 mm—
Die size445 mm²204 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 4 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Transistor count10800 million13300 millionBetter
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10044489%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100495613%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10051546%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008410017%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10055574%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10054564%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10051546%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10057593%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10051546%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.2
Basic information
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 3
Process node12 nm6 nm優位
Release date20192023-01-04
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count10800 million13300 million優位
Die size445 mm²204 mm²優位
Shader units / Cores2176優位2048
Base clock1470 MHz優位1280 MHz
Boost clock1650 MHz2469 MHz優位
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU450 W—
Power connector8 pinNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit優位128 bit
TFLOPS7.18120.23優位
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
レビューと質問
AI解説 · HEAD TO HEAD
この比較を説明
パーセンテージだけでなく、各グラフの理由・関連仕様・実用上の影響を解説します。
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
実際の構成
所有者の体験
実際の構成、結果、コミュニティのフィードバック。
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 2060 SUPER or Radeon RX 7600M XT?+
RTX 2060 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 2060 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 2060 SUPER offers more overall performance, while RTX 2060 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 2060 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 2060 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 2060 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.