Radeon RX 6500 XTVSIntel Arc A580
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6500 XT+1%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 6500 XT
VSWINNERRX 6500 XT1%H2H overall index
Intel
Arc A580
性能5050
効率10095
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5050
10095
100100
6068
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 6500 XT0No verified public setup yet
IntelArc A5800No verified public setup yet
比較結果
RX 6500 XT is the best overall choice
RX 6500 XT leads in combined gaming performance. RX 6500 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 6500 XT leads in the combined performance index
RX 6500 XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 40–45of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6500 XT
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A580
100/100 · Price $179The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50
50
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39
42Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40
40
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
95
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69Better
68
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed2310 - 2815 MHzBetter1700 - 2000 MHz
Base clock2310 MHzBetter1700 MHz
Boost clock2815 MHzBetter2000 MHz
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity4 GB8 GBBetter
メモリクロック18 GHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth144 GB/s512 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x4PCIe 4x16
Power connector6 pin8+8 pinBetter
Power consumption107 WBetter175 W
TDP107 WBetter175 W
Process node6 nm6 nm
Release date20222023Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS5.76512.29Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10050500%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10058555%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10053554%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100100955%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10055585%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10054575%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10053554%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10053554%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
基本情報
Architecture——
Process node6 nm6 nm
Release date20222023優位
Launch price——
詳細仕様
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock2310 MHz優位1700 MHz
Boost clock2815 MHz優位2000 MHz
フォームファクターと互換性
InterfacePCIe 4x4PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6 pin8+8 pin優位
VRAM容量とタイプ
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6優位
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bit優位
Memory bandwidth144 GB/s512 GB/s優位
Memory cache——
接続と出力
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
APIとSDKの互換性
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
205NVIDIAレビューと質問
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6500 XT or Arc A580?+
RX 6500 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6500 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 6500 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 6500 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6500 XT offers more overall performance, while Arc A580 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A580 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 6500 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6500 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A580 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6500 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6500 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6500 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6500 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.